HEBREWS 13

I) [REVIEW OF HEB 12:25-29 BELOW

or jump to the beginning of Hebrews chapter 13

[(Heb 12:25-29)]:

(Heb 12:25 NASB) '''See to it that you do not refuse Him Who is speaking. For if those did not escape when they refused Him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven.

(Heb 12:26 NASB) And His voice shook the earth then, but now He has promised, saying, "YET ONCE MORE I WILL SHAKE NOT ONLY THE EARTH, BUT ALSO THE HEAVEN." 

(Heb 12:27 NASB) This expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. 

(Heb 12:28 NASB) Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe; 

(Heb 12:29 NASB) for our God is a consuming fire."

[(Heb 12:25-29) Biblestudymanuals.net Commentary On Heb 12:25-29]:

(Heb 12:25 NASB) "See to it that you do not refuse Him Who is speaking. For if those did not escape when they refused Him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven.

[The author of Hebrews addresses the Hebrew christians and for that matter, all christians in view of what happened in ancient times with the Israelites of old who refused God in the sense of refusing to obey His voice on earth and as a result they did not escape God's temporal judgment; and therefore much less will the Hebrew christians of today escape God's judgment when He warns them from heaven]

(Heb 12:26 NASB) And His voice shook the earth then, but now He has promised, saying, "YET ONCE MORE I WILL SHAKE NOT ONLY THE EARTH, BUT ALSO THE HEAVEN."

[And the voice of God from the earth shook the earth then in the ancient time of Israel at Mt Sinai, but now He has promised in future times once more He will shake the earth, and not the earth only but the heaven - evidently in fulfillment of His promise to create a new heaven and a new earth:

[Compare Isa 11:6-9; 65:17-25[:

AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MESSIANIC KINGDOM THERE WILL BE MORTAL HUMAN BEINGS WHO ARE UNDER MESSIAH'S RULE FOR A THOUSAND YEARS:
(Isa 11:6-9) IN THAT DAY, ALL ANIMALS WILL DEMONSTRATE A RESPECT AND SUBMISSION, EVEN BENEVOLENCE AND PROTECTION TOWARD HUMAN BEINGS DURING THE REIGN OF THE LORD IN HIS ETERNAL KINGDOM. AND EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING ON THE EARTH WILL REFLECT A KNOWLEDGE OF GOD IMPLYING A COMPLETE RESTORATION OF THE WORLD TO THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE LORD FROM ITS FALLEN CONDITION

(Isa 11:1 HOLMAN) "Then a shoot will [have grown] from the stump of Jesse, and a branch from his roots will bear fruit. (Isa 11:2 KJV) And the Spirit of the LORD shall [have rested] upon Him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD; (Isa 11:3 NKJV) His delight is in the fear of the LORD, And He shall not judge by the sight of His eyes, Nor decide by the hearing of His ears; (Isa 11:4 YLT) And He [has] judged in righteousness the poor, and [has] decided in uprightness [i.e., in equity] for the humble [in the sense of the lowly] of [the earth]; And has [struck] the earth with the rod of His mouth, And with the breath of His lips He [puts] the wicked to death. (Isa 11:5 NKJV) Righteousness shall be the belt of His loins, And faithfulness the belt of His waist. (Isa 11:6 NKJV) The wolf also shall [have dwelt] with the lamb, The leopard shall lie down with the young goat, The calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little child shall lead them. (Isa 11:7 NKJV) The cow and the bear shall graze; Their young ones shall lie down together; And the lion shall eat straw like the ox. (Isa 11:8 NKJV) The nursing child shall play by the cobra's hole, And the weaned child shall put his hand in the viper's den. (Isa 11:9 NKJV) They shall not hurt [lit., do evil toward] nor destroy in all My holy mountain, For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD As the waters cover the sea.

In view of the appearance of the Descendant of Jesse, His indwelling by the Spirit, His demonstration of His innate fear of the LORD as Messiah to come, Isaiah moves to the description of the age in which the Messiah comes to begin His Eternal Kingdom on the earth: "The wolf also shall [have dwelt] with the lamb, The leopard shall lie down with the young goat, The calf and the young lion and the fatling [in the sense of the best, well fed yearling which is used for sacrifice] together; And a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall graze; Their young ones shall lie down together; And the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The nursing child shall play by the cobra's hole, And the weaned child shall put his hand in the viper's den. So predator will no longer be predator. All animals will demonstrate a respect and submission, even benevolence and protection toward human beings during the reign of the LORD in His eternal kingdom. Note that these changes in the animal life are literal, and not to be taken figuratively as some contend. They are possible because the Creator is Sovereign and declared through Isaiah that these changes would be characteristic of His Kingdom on earth in literal language. The restoration of human beings to God is implied in phrase "For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of God As the waters cover the sea" in the NKJV which in turn implies the complete and thorough restoration of the world's environment from its fallen condition. So the world's entire ecological system including plants, animals and people will be in harmony with the Righteous rule of the LORD. In His reign, nature will be at peace with itself and with man. Contrary to what some contend, the Eternal Kingdom rule has not yet begun, since these factors do not characterize any age of history so far: Animal life shall not hurt [lit., do evil toward] nor destroy in all My holy mountain [in the sense that the entire earth will be in that day the LORD's holy mountain], For the earth - plants, animals and people - shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD As the waters cover the sea - in the sense of everything being obedient to Him - all the people, animals and plants. Peace and tranquility will reign throughout His Kingdom - "As the waters cover the sea," (cf. Isa 9:7); (Isa 11:6-9).

(Isa 65:17-18) WHEREUPON AT THE END OF THE MILLENNIAL AGE THERE WILL BE CREATED A NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH:

(Isa 65:17 NIV) Behold, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.

(Isa 65:18 NIV) But be glad and rejoice forever in what I will create, for I will create Jerusalem to be a delight and its people a joy.' "

  (Isa 65:17-25) DOES ISA 65:17-25 REFER TO THE MILLENNIAL KINGDOM OR TO THE NEW CREATION
VERSEBYVERSEMINISTRY.ORG/BIBLE-ANSWERS ON ISA 65:17-25:

Does Isaiah 65:17-25 refer to the Millennial Kingdom or the New Creation?

December 16, 2019

Is Isaiah 65:17-25 supposed to depict the Kingdom, as v.17 suggests otherwise when God states He will "create new heavens and a new earth"? The passage also goes on to talk about infants, bearing children and death. How can this take place in the Kingdom if we have glorified bodies? 

The reference in Isaiah 65:17 to the new heavens is not the same "new heavens and earth" of Revelation 21. Isaiah is referring to the repaired world that will host the 1,000-year Kingdom on earth. We know this because of multiple details:

First, we know that the Old Testament saints never knew of events beyond the Kingdom. The Lord never revealed anything more than the coming Kingdom to Israel, so all references in the Old Testament to a future world or paradise are references to the Messianic Kingdom only.

Secondly, the context of Isaiah 65 includes details (as you mentioned) like death which are specifically excluded from the new heavens and earth that follows the Kingdom. For example:

[Compare Rev 21:1-4]:

REV. 21:1 "Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea.

REV. 21:2 And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband.

REV. 21:3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them,

REV. 21:4 and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.”

While Isaiah 65 mentions the presence of death in the Kingdom, which occurs as a result of unbelief and sin present in that world (though not for the resurrected saints), John says there is no death at all in the eternal order that follows the Kingdom.

Finally, the descriptions of the physical world found in Isaiah 65-66 do not match those of Revelation 21-22. For example, Isaiah 66:19 says there will be "coastlands" in that world, while John says in Revelation 21:1 that there will no longer be a sea in the new heavens and earth.

Therefore, we must conclude that though the phrasing between Isaiah 65 and Revelation 21 are similar, similarity does not mean they are speaking of the same place. In Isaiah the term "new heavens and new earth" refers to the changes and improvements coming in the 1,000 year / Millennial Kingdom on this earth, while the term "new heavens and a new earth" in Revelation 21 refers to the future Eternal Universe coming to replace the Millennial Kingdom.

[(Heb 12:25-29) Biblestudymanuals.net Commentary On Heb 12:25-29, cont.]:

(Heb 12:27 NASB) This expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

(Heb 12:28 NASB) Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe; 

(Heb 12:29 NASB) for our God is a consuming fire."

[These verses imply that there will be another occurrence which will be characterized by the removal / the shaking up of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken up may remain in a new and eternal kingdom which cannot be shaken, so that we may offer to God an acceptable service to God with reverence and awe - for our God indeed is a consuming fire - He is all powerful]

[Compare Rev 21:1-6]:

(Rev 21:1 NASB) "Then he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb,"

"21:1. The opening verses of chapter 21 describe the creation of the new heaven and the new earth, which chronologically follows the thousand-year reign of Christ described in chapter 20. Chapter 21 begins with the familiar words I saw, an expression repeated in verse 2 (cf. v. 22, "I did not see"). This new creation is described as a new heaven and a new earth. That it is a totally new heaven and a new earth, and not the present heaven and earth renovated, is supported by the additional statement, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away (also see comments on 20:11). An amazingly small amount of information is given about the new heaven and the new earth. But one major fact is stated in this verse: there was no longer any sea.

In contrast with the present earth, which has most of its surface covered by water, no large body of water will be on the new earth. The Bible is silent, however, on any features of the first heaven except the statement in 21:23 that there will be no sun or moon and, by implication, no stars. The new heaven refers not to the abode of God, but to the earth's atmosphere and planetary space.

No landmarks whatever are given concerning the new earth, and nothing is known of its characteristics, vegetation, color, or form. The implication, however, is that it is round and is the residence of all who are saved. A few other references are found in Scripture in relation to the new earth, including Isaiah 65:17; 66:22; and 2 Peter 3:10-13.

Because in some of these passages the Millennium is also discussed, expositors have often confused the eternal state with the Millennium. However, the principle is well established in Scripture that distant events are often telescoped together. Examples of this are Isaiah 61:1-2 (cf. Luke 4:17-19), which speaks of the first and second comings of Christ together, and Daniel 12:2, which mentions the resurrection of the righteous and of the wicked together even though, according to Revelation 20:5, they will be separated by a thousand years. Sometimes even the chronological order is reversed, as in Isaiah 65:17-25 (vv. 17-19 refer to the new heaven and new earth whereas vv. 20-25 clearly refer to the Millennium). End-time events are all also brought in close proximity in 2 Peter 3:10-13, where the beginning and the end of the day of the Lord are mentioned in the same passage.

Though expositors have differed on this point, the principle that clear passages should be used to explain obscure passages supports the conclusion that the second coming of Christ is followed by a thousand-year reign on earth, and this in turn is followed by a new heaven and new earth, the dwelling place of the saints for eternity. With the absence of any geographic identification and the absence of a sea, the new earth will obviously be entirely different. By contrast, the sea is mentioned many times in relation to the Millennium (e.g., Ps. 72:8; Isa. 11:9, 11; Ezek. 47:8-20; 48:28; Zech. 9:10; 14:8). The evidence is conclusive that the new heaven and new earth are not to be confused with the Millennium."

(Rev 21:2 NASB) "in the middle of its street. On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.

"21:2. John's attention was then directed to a specific feature of the new heaven and new earth, namely, the Holy City, the New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. The New Jerusalem is called "the Holy City," in contrast with the earthly Jerusalem (which spiritually was compared to Sodom in 11:8). As early as 3:12 the New Jerusalem was described as "the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from My God." The fact that the New Jerusalem comes down from heaven and that it is not said to be created at this point has raised the question as to whether it has been in existence during the Millennium (see further discussion on this under 21:9).

Many expositors regard the promise of Christ in John 14:2, "I am going there to prepare a place for you," as referring to this city. The suggestion has been made that if the New Jerusalem is in existence during the millennial reign of Christ, it may have been suspended in the heavens as a dwelling place for resurrected and translated saints, who nevertheless would have immediate access to the earth to carry on their functions of ruling with Christ. J. Dwight Pentecost, for instance, quotes F.C.
Jennings, William Kelly, and Walter Scott as supporting this concept of the New Jerusalem as a satellite city during the Millennium (Things to Come. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1958, pp. 577-79). In the Millennium the New Jerusalem clearly does not rest on the earth, for there is an earthly Jerusalem and an earthly temple (Ezek. 40-48).

The New Jerusalem then will apparently be withdrawn from its proximity to the earth when the earth will be destroyed at the end of the Millennium, and then will come back after the new earth is created. Though this possibility of a satellite city has been disregarded by most commentators and must be considered as an inference rather than a direct revelation of the Bible, it does solve some problems of the relationship between the resurrected and translated saints to those still in their natural bodies in the Millennium, problems which otherwise are left without explanation.

Here, however, the New Jerusalem is described as it will be in the eternal state, and it is said to be "a bride beautifully dressed for her husband." Because the church is pictured in Scripture as a bride (2 Cor. 11:2), some have tried to identify the New Jerusalem's inhabitants as specifically the church saints, excluding saints of other dispensations. However, the use of marriage as an illustration is common in Scripture, not only to relate Christ to the church but also Yahweh to Israel. Though the city is compared to a beautifully dressed bride, it actually is a city, not a person or group of people."

(Rev 21:3 NASB) "There will no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and His bond-servants will serve Him;

(Rev 21:4 NASB) they will see His face, and His name will be on their foreheads."

"21:3-4. Following this initial revelation of the New Jerusalem John wrote, I heard a loud voice from the throne. This is the last of 20 times that the expression "a loud voice" is used in Revelation (first used in 5:2).

The final revelation from heaven states that God will then dwell with men, that the saints will be His people and He will be their God. In eternity saints will enjoy a new intimacy with God which is impossible in a world where sin and death are still present. The new order will be without sorrow. God will wipe every tear from their eyes, and death with its mourning, and pain with its crying will vanish, for the old order of things will have passed away.

Some have wondered if grief and sorrow will exist for a while in heaven and then be done away with here at the establishing of the new order. It is better to understand this passage as saying that heaven will have none of the features that so characterize the present earth.

(Rev 21:5 NASB) "And He who sits on the throne said, "Behold, I am making all things new." And He said, "Write, for these words are faithful and true."

(Rev 21:6 NASB)
Then He said to me, "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost."

"21:5-6. The dramatic change to the new order is expressed in the words, I am making everything new! This revelation is trustworthy and true, and John was instructed to write down that fact. The One bringing about the change is Christ, who calls Himself the Alpha and the Omega (cf. 1:8; 22:13), the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet, interpreted by the phrase the Beginning and the End.

Those who are thirsty are promised that they will be able to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. Apparently this refers not to physical thirst but to a desire for spiritual blessings."

[(Heb 12:25-29) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 12:25-29)]:

"E. A Kingdom That Cannot Be Shaken (12:25-29)
Earthly, material things (things that can be "shaken") will not last forever. By contrast, God's kingdom is unshakable, and the author uses the contrast as an exhortation to right conduct. He has made it plain that God will not trifle with wrongdoing. The persistent sinner can reckon only on severe judgment. God will bring all things present to an end. Accordingly, the readers should serve him faithfully."

(Heb 12:25 NASB) "See to it that you do not refuse Him Who is speaking. For if those did not escape when they refused Him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven."

"25 Several times in this epistle Judaism and Christianity have been contrasted, and here the contrast concerns the way God speaks. Some feel there is a contrast between Moses and Christ. This may be so, but the basic contrast is between the way God spoke of old and the way he now speaks. Israel of old "refused" him, which means that in their manner of life they rejected what God said and failed to live up to what he commanded (cf. Deut 5:29; the writer cannot be referring to Israel's refusal to hear God's voice because they were praised for this, Deut 5:24-28). What God said was a warning "on earth" because it was connected with the revelation made at Sinai. If, then, the Israelites of old did not escape the consequences of their refusal of a voice on earth, the readers ought not to expect that they will escape far worse consequences if they "turn away from him who warns us from heaven."

(Heb 12:26 NASB) And His voice shook the earth then, but now He has promised, saying, "YET ONCE MORE I WILL SHAKE NOT ONLY THE EARTH, BUT ALSO THE HEAVEN." 

"26 Here the solemnity of Sinai is recalled. Repeatedly we are told that then the earth shook (Exod 19:18; Judg 5:4-5; Pss 68:8; 77:18; 114:4, 7). The writer has already spoken of the awe-inspiring nature of what happened when the law was given. Now the reference to the shaking of the earth brings it all back. At the same time it enables him to go on to speak of a promise that involved a further shaking, that recorded in Haggai 2:6. The prophet looked forward to something much grander than Sinai. Then God shook the earth, but Haggai foresaw a day when God would shake "not only the earth but also the heavens." This will be no small event but one of cosmic grandeur. The reference to heaven and earth may be meant to hint at the concept of the new heaven and the new earth (Isa 66:22). At any rate, it points to the decisive intervention that God will make at the last time."

(Heb 12:27 NASB) '''This expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'''

"27 The writer picks out the expression "once more" (eti hapax; lit., "yet once more") to point out the decisive significance of the things of which he is writing. There is an air of finality about it all. This is the decisive time. The word rendered "the removing" (metathesin) can mean a "change" (as in 7:12 of a change of law). But "removal" is also possible and seems better in this context. What can be shaken will be removed in that day. NIV renders hos pepoiemenonas "that is, created things" (RSV, "as of what has been made"), and this is the sense of it (poieo is often used of God's creative activity). This physical creation can be shaken, and it is set in contrast to what cannot be shaken. These are the things that really matter, the things that have the character of permanence. The author does not go into detail about the precise nature of the ultimate rest. But whatever it may be, it will separate the things that last forever from those that do not. "So that" introduces a clause of purpose. It is God's will for this final differentiation to be made so that only what cannot be shaken will remain."

(Heb 12:28 NASB) "Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe;"

"28 The "kingdom" is not a frequent subject in this epistle (the word occurs in a quotation in 1:8 and in the plural in 11:33). This is in contrast to the synoptic Gospels, where the "kingdom" is the most frequent subject in the teaching of Jesus. But this passage shows that the author understood ultimate reality in terms of God's sovereignty. This reality contrasts with earthly systems. They can be shaken and in due course will be shaken. Not so God's kingdom! The author does not simply say that it will not be shaken but that it cannot be shaken. It has a quality found in nothing earthly. The kingdom is something we "receive." It is not earned or created by believers; it is God's gift.

It is not quite certain how we should understand the expression "let us be thankful" (echomen charin). A strong argument for this rendering is that it is the usual meaning of the expression. But charis means "grace"; and, as Montefiore (in loc.) points out, elsewhere in this epistle it signifies "grace" rather than "gratitude." He thinks that the duty of thanksgiving is not inculcated elsewhere in Hebrews nor is it particularly appropriate here. So he prefers to translate it, "Let us hold on to God's grace" (JB is similar). Montefiore's position is favored by the following "through which" (di' hes), which NIV renders "and so." The writer appears to be saying that we must appropriate the grace God offers and not let it go, because it is only by grace that we serve as we should. "Worship" may be too narrow for latreuomen, for the word can be used of service of various kinds. KJV renders it "serve." Whether the meaning is service in general or worship in particular, it must be done "with reverence and awe." The combination stresses the greatness of God and the lowly place his people should take in relation to him."

(Heb 12:29 NASB) "for our God is a consuming fire."

"29 In an expression apparently taken from Deuteronomy 4:24, the writer emphasizes that God is not to be trifled with. It is easy to be so taken up with the love and compassion of God that we overlook his implacable opposition to all evil. The wrath of God is not a popular subject today but it looms large in biblical teaching. The writer is stressing that his readers overlook this wrath at their peril. Baillie speaks of the wrath of God "as being identical with the consuming fire of inexorable divine love in relation to our sins" (D.M. Baillie, God Was in Christ [London: Faber & Faber 1955], p. 189). It is something like this to which the writer directs his readers' attention.

The first twelve chapters of Hebrews form a closely knit argument. Chapter 13 is something of an appendix dealing with a number of practical points. Some commentators find the difference so striking that they think it an addition by someone other than the author of the first twelve chapters. This is going too far. There is no linguistic difference, and, while the argument is not so tight, it is in the manner of the author, especially the section on the cross (vv. 9-14).
"

[(Heb 12:25-29) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 12:25-29]:

(Heb 12:25 NASB) "See to it that you do not refuse Him Who is speaking. For if those did not escape when they refused Him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven."

"12:25. The contrast between the two covenants is now focused as a contrast between a warning given on earth and one that issues from heaven itself. Since those who refused the Old Covenant did not escape, how could those of the New Covenant who turn away expect to do so? (cf. 2:3) Here no doubt the author thought of the Speaker as none other than the Originator of the New Covenant who now sits "at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven" (1:3).

(Heb 12:26 NASB) And His voice shook the earth then, but now He has promised, saying, "YET ONCE MORE I WILL SHAKE NOT ONLY THE EARTH, BUT ALSO THE HEAVEN." 

(Heb 12:27 NASB) '''This expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'''

"12:26-27. This is the divine voice which once shook only the earth, but will ultimately shake not only the earth but also the heavens. The reference to Haggai 2:6 was understood by the author as speaking of the ultimate remaking of the heavens and earth which will follow the millennial kingdom (cf. Heb. 1:10-12). What remains after this cataclysmic event will be eternal."

(Heb 12:28 NASB) "Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe;"

(Heb 12:29 NASB) "for our God is a consuming fire."

"12:28-29. And such is the character of the kingdom which we are receiving. The words let us be thankful may be rendered "let us have [or, 'obtain'] grace" (echōmen charin) and are likely a final reference to the resources of grace available from the great High Priest (cf. 4:14-16). This is confirmed by the words and so (lit., "through which," diʾ ēsʾ which remind the readers that this grace is required in order to worship (better, "serve," latreuōmen, also used in 8:5; 9:9; 10:2; 13:10) God acceptably within the New-Covenant community. Failure to do so should be deterred by the concluding solemn thought that our God is a consuming fire (cf. 10:26-27). A believer who departs from his magnificent privileges will invite God's retribution."

[Biblestudymanuals note: The New-Covenant community is that generation of Israel alone who all to a man will believe in Christ evidently at His Second Coming , but other 'communities' - those believers of the time from Adam and Eve on to Abraham, and those believers during the time of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Israel until the beginning of the Church Age; and believers of the Church Age will all benefit from  Christ's work on the cross, each individual and group in accordance with the sovereignty of God.

Finally, a believer who departs from his magnificient privileges - which is every believer every day of his mortal life - for no one can say he is without sin: 1 Jn 1:8 - will indeed invite God's retribution to the extent of his departure, not the least of which is loss of eternal rewards and discipline while in his mortal body . But salvation unto eternal life via a moment of faith alone in Christ alone + nothing else cannot result in loss of eternal life for that born of God, child of God. Once a child of God born of God always a child of God born of God.]


I) [Heb 13:1-6 NASB]:

(Heb 13:1 NASB) '''Let love of the brethren continue.

(Heb 13:2 NASB) Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it.

(Heb 13:3 NASB) Remember the prisoners, as though in prison with them, and those who are ill-treated, since you yourselves also are in the body.

(Heb 13:4 NASB) Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.

(Heb 13:5 NASB) Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I WILL NEVER DESERT YOU, NOR WILL I EVER FORSAKE YOU,"

(Heb 13:6 NASB) so that we confidently say, "THE LORD IS MY HELPER, I WILL NOT BE AFRAID. WHAT WILL MAN DO TO ME?" '''

A) [(Heb 13:1-6) BIBLESTUDYMANUALS COMMENTARY ON HEB 13:1-6]:

(Heb 13:1 NASB) '''Let love of the brethren continue.

[So the writer tells believers to let their love - in the sense of kindness toward one another; i.e., brotherly love - brothers and sisters in Christ - "continue to demonstrate their love for one another."]

(Heb 13:2 NASB) "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it."

[The writer goes on to write that the Jewish believers in the first century are not to neglect to show hospitality in the sense of expressing receptive kindness toward those who are strangers to them albeit fellow Jewish believers - which may be risky in a number of ways in today's world such as causing them harm, or resulting in negative reactions, etc. On the other hand, fruitful results, i.e., "happy" ones may follow acts of hospitality - even to the extent that they may have entertained angels without knowing it - implying great benefit. Acts of hospitality toward strangers, especially visitors to a village were highly esteemed in the ancient world and became a custom amongst fellow ancient Jews and fellow first century Christians as well. On the other hand, ancient customs that are not prevelant today might NOT provide a suitable and safe stage for providing hospitality to strangers in today's world everywhere you go except perhaps in small rural and or remote settings where there is a need for and safe conditions for hospitality to strangers. So believers in this age are nevertheless to keep an eye on people to see if they can be of aid in some manner as testimony of the Christian love for all peoples brothers in Christ and people of all beliefs]

(Heb 13:3 NASB)
Remember the prisoners, as though in prison with them, and those who are ill-treated, since you yourselves also are in the body.

[The phrase rendered, "Remember the prisoners, as though in prison with them" has in view fellow believers who have been imprisoned because they were active in sharing their faith, and some of them were "ill-treated," because of the next phrase rendered, "since you yourselves also are in the body" in the sense of being of the body of Christ. This is not very applicable for today, albeit there are parts of the world where persecution of believers is indeed active, giving fellow believers the circumstance /  opportunity to remember them through prayer and visitation]

(Heb 13:4 NASB) Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.

[And the author goes on to write that marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled in the sense of being faithful to ones spouse with the proviso warning that fornicators and adulterers will be judged by God]

(Heb 13:5 NASB) Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, find out which verse: "I WILL NEVER DESERT YOU, NOR WILL I EVER FORSAKE YOU,"

Then in verse 5, the author states that believers in this age, most directly to Jewish believers are to make sure that their character is free from the love of money. They are to be content with what they have, confident in God and His care for one on the basis of His plan for one: "for He Himself has said, 'I will never desert you, nor ever forsake you," signifying that His grand eternal plan for one - His child born of Him  - will be completely fulfilled no matter what: a great statement of eternal life security based on a moment of faith alone in His promise alone of the gift of eternal life through His Son alone. Albeit rewards in this life and the next will come on the basis of the child's response of acts of faithfulness during his mortal life ].

1) [Compare Dt 31:6]:
"Be strong and courageous, do not be afraid or in dread of them, for the LORD your God is the ONE Who is going with you, He will not desert you or abandon you.

[Command to ancient Israel before going into the promised land]

(Heb 13:6 NASB) so that we confidently say, "THE LORD IS MY HELPER, I WILL NOT BE AFRAID. WHAT WILL MAN DO TO ME?" '''

[And all of this can we who have believed confidently say, "The Lord is my helper, I will not be afraid. What will man do to me?"]

2) [Compare Ps 118:6]:

(Ps 118:6 NASB) "The LORD is for me; I will not fear, What can man do to me?"

[Believers of all ages from Adam and Eve through their age to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their time, followed by Israel through to the church age - those that are believers through today and the future times until eternity]

B) [(Heb 13:1-6) Expositor's Commentary On Heb 13:1-6]:


(Heb 13:1 NASB) '''Let love of the brethren continue.

'''F. Love (13:1-6)
Christians are to be concerned for the needs of others. Those Christ has died for cannot live for themselves. Christianity is faith in action and that means love at work. So the writer draws attention to something of what it means to live in love.

1 "Brotherly love" (philadelphia) is a most important virtue in the NT. Those who are linked in the common bond of having been saved by the death of Jesus cannot but have warm feelings toward one another (cf. Rom 12:10; 1 Thess 4:9; 1 Peter 1:22; 2 Peter 1:7; in the OT see Ps 133:1). Calvin comments, "We can only be Christians if we are brethren" (in loc.).'''

[Biblestudymanuals commentary on above commentary by Expositor's:
This is what Christians are commanded to do, for example: to be concerned for the needs of others - especially fellow believers and follow through with actions. But failure to do these things does not disqualify them from being Christian. But it does indicate that whenever they fail they are not being faithful Christians and may be under God's discipline as well ]


B cont.) [(Heb 13:1-6) Expositor's Commentary On Heb 13:1-6, (cont.)]:

(Heb 13:2 NASB) "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it.''

'''2 To "brotherly love" the author adds "hospitality" (philoxenia, "love of strangers"). Entertaining angels unawares reminds us of Abraham (Gen 18:1ff.) and Lot (Gen 19:1ff.). The writer is not advocating hospitality on the off chance that one might happen to receive an angel as guest but rather because God is pleased when believers are hospitable. Sometimes unexpectedly happy results follow acts of hospitality. It was highly esteemed in the ancient world and was certainly very important for Christians. Accommodation at inns was expensive, and in any case inns had a bad reputation. But as Christian preachers traveled around, believers gave them lodging and so facilitated their mission. Without hospitality in Christian homes, the spread of the faith would have been much more difficult.'''

[Biblestudymanuals commentary on Expositor's commentary above:

The writer goes on to write that the Jewish believers in the first century are not to neglect to show hospitality in the sense of expressing receptive kindness toward those who are strangers to them albeit fellow Jewish believers - which may be risky in a number of ways in today's world such as causing them harm, or resulting in negative reactions, etc. On the other hand, fruitful results, i.e., "happy" ones may follow acts of hospitality - even to the extent that they may have entertained angels without knowing it - implying great benefit. Acts of hospitality toward strangers, especially visitors to a village were highly esteemed in the ancient world and became a custom amongst fellow ancient Jews and fellow first century Christians as well. On the other hand, ancient customs that are not prevelant today might NOT provide a suitable and safe stage for providing hospitality to strangers in today's world everywhere you go except perhaps in small rural and or remote settings where there is a need for and safe conditions for hospitality to strangers. So believers in this age are nevertheless to keep an eye on people to see if they can be of aid in some manner as testimony of the Christian love for all peoples brothers in Christ and people of all beliefs]

[B cont.) [(Heb 13:1-6) Expositor's Commentary On Heb 13:1-6, (cont.)]:

(Heb 13:3 NASB) Remember the prisoners, as though in prison with them, and those who are ill-treated, since you yourselves also are in the body.

"3 The writer takes a further step in turning his attention to prisoners. Guests may come unbidden, but prisoners must be actively sought out. In the first century prisoners were not well treated, and they depended—often even for necessities like food—on sympathizers. Sometimes people withheld help for fear of identifying them selves with the prisoners and suffering similar punishment. But Christians should have compassion on those in prison "as if you were their fellow prisoners." "If one part suffers, every part suffers with it," wrote Paul (1Cor 12:26); and there is something of the same thought here. Believers should feel so much for their friends in prison and for "those who are mistreated" that they become one with them. Compassion is an essential part of Christian living."

[Biblestudymanuals Commentary on above commentary from Expositor's]:
Notice that those in view in prison were fellow believers - friends in Christ not strangers]


(Heb 13:4 NASB) "Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge."

[B cont.) [(Heb 13:1-6) Expositor's Commentary On Heb 13:1-6, (cont.)]:

'''4 From love for the badly treated the author turns to love within the marriage bond. We should probably understand the opening expression as an imperative: "Let marriage be held in honor" (RSV). "By all" (en pasin) might be masculine, "among all men," or neuter, "in all circumstances," probably the latter. Some ascetics held marriage in low esteem, but the author repudiates this position. "The marriage bed" is a euphemism for sexual intercourse. He considers the physical side of marriage important and "pure." Contrary to the views of some thinkers in the ancient world, there is nothing defiling about it. Over against honorable marriage he sets "sexual immorality" (pornous; the word is usually rendered "fornicators") and "adulterers" (moichous, used where violation of the marriage bond is involved).
All forms of sexual sin come under the judgment of God. This was a novel view to many in the first century. For them chastity was an unreasonable demand to make. It is one of the unrecognized miracles that Christians were able not only to make this demand but to make it stick. The word "God" comes last in the Greek and is emphatic. Sexual sinners are likely to go their way, careless of all others. But in the end they will be judged by none less than God."

(Heb 13:5 NASB) "Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I WILL NEVER DESERT YOU, NOR WILL I EVER FORSAKE YOU,"

"5 Sins of impurity and covetousness are also linked elsewhere in the NT (e.g., 1 Cor 5:10-11; Eph 4:19; 5:3-5; 1 Thess 4:3-6). The covetous man pursues his selfish aims, whether sexual or financial, without regard to the rights of others. So the writer warns against the love of money and urges contentment with what one has. In any case covetousness is needless, for the believer has the promise that God will never leave him nor forsake him. The origin of this quotation is not clear; the words do not correspond exactly to any OT passage, though there are several statements that are rather like it (e.g., Gen 28:15; Deut 31:6, 8; Josh 1:5; 1 Chronicles 28:20; Isa 41:17; perhaps closest is Josh 1:5). It is interesting that Philo has the same quotation in the same words (O
n the Confusion of Tongues 166). Accordingly, it seems that both Philo and the writer of Hebrews are quoting from a version of the LXX that has not survived. Be that as it may, the words point to the complete reliability of God. Since he has promised to help his own, covetousness in all its forms is useless. God's people are secure no matter what comes, because he is with them. Beside this great fact, the petty securities of worldly possessions, position, and the like do not matter at all."

(Heb 13:6 NASB) '''so that we confidently say, "THE LORD IS MY HELPER, I WILL NOT BE AFRAID. WHAT WILL MAN DO TO ME?" '''

"6 Despondency is foreign to Christians. They can speak "with confidence" (tharrountas, a participle that indicates an attitude of courage and trust). "We" once more links the writer with his readers. He sees his lot as bound up with theirs. The quotation from Psalm 118:6 is exact, agreeing with the LXX (117:6). There are three points in this confidence. First, the Lord is the psalmist's (and our) helper. This carries on the argument of the previous verse, sharpening a little the thought of the assistance that the believer may count on. Second, there is the ringing declaration of confidence as the psalmist renounces fear. With the Helper he has at his side, there is no reason for fear, and he has none. Third, there is the rhetorical question that underlies man's insignificance. The question is "What will man do to me?" rather than "What can man do to me?" as in NIV, JB, NEB, RSV, and TEV. It is performance rather than capacity the psalmist is speaking of. He is not thinking theoretically but of what will happen. Man will not succeed in anything he attempts to do against one who trusts in God."

[Biblestudymanuals Commentary on Expositor's Commentary Above on Heb 13:5-6 which reads as follows:


(Heb 13:5 NASB)
'''Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I WILL NEVER DESERT YOU, NOR WILL I EVER FORSAKE YOU,

(Heb 13:6 NASB) so that we confidently say, "THE LORD IS MY HELPER, I WILL NOT BE AFRAID. WHAT WILL MAN DO TO ME?" '''

and Expositor's Commentary which
reads in part, '''Despondency is foreign to Christians. They can speak "with confidence" (tharrountas, a participle that indicates an attitude of courage and trust)"

There is no Christian that leads a perfect mortal life and without moments of despondency in order to be a 'real' Christian. That's nonsense and unbiblical. If "true" believers are automatically faithful and if faithful lives are required in order to be and remain a Christian then why all the passages in Scripture that command believers to behave properly
and consequences if they don't - none of which are loss of ones salvation unto eternal life? Furthermore, the more a believer makes efforts to be faithful the more challenges he faces from an evil world bent upon defeating those efforts. Most believers seek refuge from these challenges by attempting to blend in with the world, not demonstrating and sharing their faith to others - not standing upon and being recognized as a believer in Jesus Christ. No believer can claim to have perfect moments of faithfulness, (ref 1jn1:8 ). By the grace of God, every believer's possession of eternal life is not dependant upon being faithful, and not dependent upon not ever being despondent. Their salvation is dependent upon a single moment of faith alone in Christ alone without requirements such as not ever falling away from the faith]

[C) [(Heb 13:1-6) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:1-6]:


(Heb 13:1 NASB) '''Let love of the brethren continue.

(Heb 13:2 NASB) Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it.

(Heb 13:3 NASB) Remember the prisoners, as though in prison with them, and those who are ill-treated, since you yourselves also are in the body.

(Heb 13:4 NASB) Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.

(Heb 13:5 NASB) Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I WILL NEVER DESERT YOU, NOR WILL I EVER FORSAKE YOU,"

(Heb 13:6 NASB) so that we confidently say, "THE LORD IS MY HELPER, I WILL NOT BE AFRAID. WHAT WILL MAN DO TO ME?" '''

"EPILOGUE (CHAP. 13)
The Epilogue can be distinguished from the body of the epistle in that the latter contains only broad, general admonitions, while the Epilogue contains specific ones. In some ways these specific instructions suggest ways "to worship God acceptably" (cf. 12:28). The Epilogue also contains the writer's personal comments to his readers and his farewell to them.

13:1-6. The first section of the Epilogue contains moral directions for the readers. Obeying these would inculcate personal kindness to brothers (v. 1), strangers (v. 2), and prisoners (v. 3). The writer then called for sexual purity in which marriage is held in high regard (v. 4). The readers were also to avoid monetary greed and to be content with what they have (v. 5; cf. Luke 12:15; Phil. 4:11; 1 Tim. 6:6-10). Even if they had little on the material level, they had the Lord (Heb. 13:5) and His help (v. 6).


II) [Heb 13:7-8]:

(Heb 13:7 NASB) "Remember those who led you, who spoke the word of God to you; and considering the result of their conduct, imitate their faith.
 
(Heb 13:8 NASB) Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

A) [(Heb 13:7-8) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:7-8]:

(Heb 13:7 NASB) "Remember those who led you, who spoke the word of God to you; and considering the result of their conduct, imitate their faith.
 
(Heb 13:8 NASB) Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

The author of Hebrews now writes to the Hebrew Christians to remember those who led them - evidently believers who were their teachers, those who spoke the word of God to them, and were examples to them relative to their conduct. And he says to them to imitate their faith. And then he adds to sum it all up on this issue: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever" saying that over all of this, i.e., overriding all of this is the Lord Jesus Christ Himself Who is and will always be the same yesterday and today and forever. So be confident that He is always with you, wholly and absolutely consistent in His relationship with you as He has promised.

B) (Heb 13:7-8) Expositor's
Commentary On Heb 13:7-8]:

(Heb 13:7 NASB) "Remember those who led you, who spoke the word of God to you; and considering the result of their conduct, imitate their faith."

"G. Christian Leadership (13:7-8)
The concluding section of the epistle contains a number of small, disconnected units. From love the writer passes to a few thoughts about Christian leaders. This is important, for there is not much in the NT about the way Christians should treat their leaders. There is, however, more about how leaders themselves should behave.

7 Three times in this chapter the present participle of the verb hegeomai occurs in the sense of "
leader" (here, vv. 17, 24). The term is a general one and is used of leaders of religious bodies as well as of princes, military commanders, etc. This makes it difficult to say precisely who these leaders were or what they did. They may have been "elders," but that word is not used of them and so we cannot be sure that they were elders. They "spoke the word of God" so that one of their principal functions was preaching or teaching. But again the word is a general one. The aorist tense may well point to a specific time—that of the original proclamation of the gospel to these readers (cf. 2:3). "The word of God" is the totality of the Christian message, and the expression reminds the readers that this is no human invention but of divine origin.
The word translated "outcome" (ekbasis, again in the NT only in 1Cor 10:13) is understood by many as a euphemism for death, often as a martyr's death (so Hering, Westcott, Moffatt). "Martyr's death" does seem to be stretching the word a bit. On the whole, however, it seems as though past leaders were in mind (though TEV is much too definite with "Remember your former leaders .... Think back on how they lived and died"). The past tenses and the word ekbasis support this, though it is not impossible to see the meaning as "consider the result of their manner of life." They are held up as examples to be imitated and, specifically, their faith is singled out. Faith is the important thing, and the readers were being tempted to unbelief in falling back from the Christian way. They should instead follow these good examples of faith."

(Heb 13:8 NASB) "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

"8 In this profound and wonderfully succinct verse, the writer's thoughts turn again to Christ. Earthly leaders come and go, but he is always there. The full name "Jesus Christ" (again in Hebrews only in 10:10; 13:21) adds solemnity to this pronouncement. Echthes ("yesterday") should probably not be taken to refer to Christ's preexistence or the Incarnation. It stands for the past as a whole and is part of an expression taking up past, present, and future into an impressive statement of Christ's unchanging nature. The readers need not fear that Christ is different now or will be different in the future from what he has been in the past. Past or present makes no difference to the eternal Savior. "Forever" (eis tous aionias, "into the ages," "to eternity") takes the continuity as far into the future as it will go. No matter what ages lie ahead, Christ will be unchanged through them. Christian conduct is based on this certainty. Christ will never be superseded."

C) (Heb 13:7-8) Bible Knowledge
Commentary On Heb 13:7-8]:

(Heb 13:7 NASB) "
Remember those who led you, who spoke the word of God to you; and considering the result of their conduct, imitate their faith.

(Heb 13:8 NASB) Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

"13:7-8. Religious directions follow the moral ones and this segment of the Epilogue extends through verse 17. The call, Remember your leaders, perhaps referred to former leaders who had passed away. The outcome of their way of life could be contemplated with good effect and the readers were to imitate their faith. Those leaders were gone, but Jesus Christ of Whom they spoke remains continuously the same."

III) [Heb 13:9-16]:

A) [(Heb 13:9) Biblestudymanuals On Heb 13:9]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB)
"Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited."

[The author of Hebrews writes of his readers' being exposed to varied and strange teachings without stipulating further specifics - teachings of which are not conducive to growing in the faith of Christianity: He implies that these varied and strange teachings do not strengthen / benefit the heart, i.e., the mind
/ the knowledge of God's Word by the grace of God which is good. These varied and strange teachings provided "foods" which did not benefit the heart to be strengthened by God's grace, i.e., they were not benefitted spiritually in a godly way in the heart, i.e., the mind . Other passages indicate that these strange teachings - strange to God's Word on this matter - were about certain temporal and non-beneficial matters for Christians to obey in order to benefit in a spiritual manner such as what foods to eat and drink or other temporal things]

1) [(Heb 13:9) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:9]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited."

'''H. Christian Sacrifice (13:9-16)
The writer has put strong emphasis on the centrality of Christ's sacrifice and keeps this steadily in view as he approaches the end of his letter. He has some erroneous teaching in mind, but we cannot define it with precision. He and his readers both knew what it was, so there was no need for him to be specific. Whatever it was, the unchangeability of Christ should inspire them to refuse its curious diversities and novel teaching.

Once more the writer draws attention to Christ's sacrifice, using the ceremonies of the Day of Atonement as the basis. Some may have thought the Christian way an impoverished one, lacking the sacrifices that were central to religion in the ancient world. But Christians do have sacrifices, none the less real for being spiritual and not material.

9 The writer warns against being carried away by "all kinds of strange teachings." "All kinds of" renders poikilais; literally, "many-colored." Since it points to a great variety of teaching, it is difficult to identify specifically what is in mind. There was not one straightforward piece of wrong teaching but a variety of wrong teachings. "Strange" renders xenais ("foreign," i.e., foreign to the gospel). The readers should know better than to go after such teachings, for they have known the grace of God. The heart, as often, stands for the whole of the inner life; and this is sustained, not by anything material, such as food, but by grace. God is the source of the believer's strength as he lives out the Christian life.

Though there is nothing in the Greek to correspond to the adjective "ceremonial which NIV prefixes to "foods," this is probably a correct gloss. Most religions of the day had food regulations, as did the Jews; but usually this meant that some foods were regarded as "unclean." The foods were not regarded as "good for our hearts." So it seems likely that what the worshipers took to be the beneficial effects of some sacrificial meal are in mind. The author denies it. The real life of man is not sustained on the level of things to eat. It requires the grace of God. The end of the verse means something like "in which those who walk are not profited" (NIV has paraphrased). This points to a way of life in which "foods" are a dominant element.'''


2) [(Heb 13:9) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:9]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited."

"13:9. That is why new doctrines which conflict with the unchanging message about Jesus Christ should be rejected. The author's reference here to all kinds of strange teachings does not sound at all like a reference to normative Judaism but as if the readers were confronting a peculiar, sectarian variation of that religion (cf. comments under "Background and Setting" in the Heb. Introduction)."

[Biblestudymanuals comment on "normative Judaism:" This begs the question, "What is normative Judaism? The majority of Jews evidently held to the view that Jesus was NOT the Messiah. Is that normative? No. The Old Testament Scriptures properly interpreted authenticated Who Jesus is and Jesus fulfilled all descriptions of Him perfectly so far in history. Now that's normative despite the rejection of Him by most Jews throughout the years]

B) [(Heb 13:10) Biblestudymanuals On Heb 13:10]:

(Heb 13:10 NASB)
"We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat."

So the author writes that we - believers in Christ, especially in view are Jewish believers in Christ - have an altar of Christ's perfect sacrifice for the sins of all of humanity, (1 Jn 2:2) - an altar (of the cross) from which all those who serve the tabernacle would have no right to eat as that altar of the ancient tabernacle was not effective toward forgiveness of sins unto eternal life - but the future "altar" since the tabernacle altar = cross of Christ would be and is effective 100% for forgiveness of sins for all who express just a moment of faith alone in that sacrifice for sins. Therefore those who served the tabernacle had no right to eat - figuratively speaking - of the altar of the cross of Christ.

1) [(Heb 13:10) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:10]:

(Heb 13:10 NASB) "We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat."

"10 Some see the "altar" as the communion table (from which Christians, but not others, eat). But this is a curious way of interpreting the passage in the light of the point just made. This would simply be substituting one material thing for another, and the whole argument would fall to the ground. Instead the writer is saying that the cross is distinctive to the Christian way. It was on a cross that the Christian sacrifice was offered. Thus it may not improperly be spoken of as an "altar." In a Christian context the sacrifice must be on the cross as the author has made abundantly clear in a number of places. "Those who minister at the tabernacle" are often understood to be the Jewish priests. But the word latreuontes ("those who minister") may be used of the service of others than priests, and the participle is used of worshipers in 9:9; 10:2. The writer seems to be speaking of Jewish worshipers in general. Those who worship at the tent have, as such, no rights in the altar of the cross. The crucified Savior means nothing to them. The writer is pointing his readers to the privilege Christians have and warning them against losing it.

[Biblestudymanuals comment on the last sentence above which reads, "
The writer is pointing his readers to the privilege Christians have and warning them against losing it."
Incorrect. Christians cannot become non-Christians by losing their salvation . On the other hand should they reject their salvation or behave in such an egregious manner they are in danger of losing rewards in this life and the next, and suffer severe punishment in their temporal lives ]

C) [(Heb 13:9-11) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:11]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

(Heb 13:10 NASB) We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat.

(Heb 13:11 NASB) For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp."

So those who have been teaching that the blood of animals sacrificed on the altar of the tabernacle in which the blood of those animals was brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin; they were nevertheless NOT benefitted with eternal forgiveness of sins. Furthermore, the bodies of those animals were to be burned outside the camp. Note further that just as the bodies of those animals whose blood was brought into the holy place by the high priest of the Tabernacle (and Temple) as an offering for sin, those bodies were burned outside the camp, so Christ's body - His  sacrifice for sins was also made outside the city   of Jerusalem.

1) [(Heb 13:11) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:11[:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

(Heb 13:10 NASB) We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat.

(Heb 13:11 NASB) For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp."

'''11 "For" (gar, which NIV omits) leads from the general idea of serving the altar to a specific example, one taken from the Day of Atonement ceremonies in all probability. The doubt is caused by the fact that the expression that NIV renders "the Most Holy Place" (ta hagia) may be used of the "Holy Place" (as in 9:2); and there were sin offerings other than those of the Day of Atonement when the bodies were burned outside the camp (Lev 4:12, 21). But there have been references to the Day of Atonement earlier in the epistle, which also seems to fit the present passage better than the other sin offerings. On that Day the high priest brought the blood of the victims into the Most Holy Place (Lev 16:14-15), but the bodies of the animals were burned outside the camp (Lev 16:27). The word used here for "animals" (zoon) is not common in the Bible and does not appear to be used elsewhere of sacrificial victims. The bodies of the animals used on the Day of Atonement were burnt up—totally consumed—in the fire. This was "outside the camp," the word drawing attention to the wilderness situation ("camp," parembole, basically a military term, was readily applied to such situations as that of Israel in the wilderness).'''


D) [(Heb 13:12) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:12]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

(Heb 13:10 NASB) We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat.

(Heb 13:11 NASB) For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp.

(Heb 13:12 NASB) Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate."

Just as it stipulates in Heb 13:11 that the bodies of those animals whose blood was brought into the holy place inside the tabernacle by the high priest as a sacrifice, i.e., as a blood offering for sin for temporal forgiveness of daily sins, (not eternal) - those animal bodies were then taken and burned outside the camp - away from the tabernacle; so Jesus also - His body through His own blood - was sacrificed and suffered for the sins of the people Israel [and all mankind, cf. 1 Jn 2:2), entirely outside the gate of Jerusalem just as the bodies of the sacrificed animals for sins were put outside of the holy place once they were killed and their blood drained as a sacrifice. Albeit the blood offering sacrifice for sins via the animals was made inside the tabernacle at the altar - the holy place - it was exclusively for temporal sins, not for eternal life.

So the animals were sacrificed as sin offerings albeit not to the extent of Christ's blood payment for sins unto eternal life to sanctify the people, i.e., to set apart God's people unto eternal life - evidently referring to the people of Israel - but as Scripture elsewhere indicates, Christ's sacrifice was done for all mankind, (cf. 1 Jn 2:2). It was Christ's Whose blood and body was offered for sins unto eternal life outside the gate of Jerusalem.

1) [(Heb 13:9-12) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:12]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB) "Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

(Heb 13:10 NASB) We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat.

(Heb 13:11 NASB) For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp.

(Heb 13:12 NASB) Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate."

'''12 "And so" (dio) [therefore in the NASB] introduces an inference. The Day of Atonement typologically foreshadowed the atoning work of Jesus. The author apparently is reasoning that because the type involved an activity "outside the camp," there will be an equivalent with the antitype. The parallel is not complete because in the case of the sin offerings the animal was actually killed inside the camp and only the carcass disposed of outside the camp (though the red heifer, "which was a kind of sin-offering, was slaughtered outside the camp," Bruce, in loc.). The type was clear enough. The human name Jesus brings before us the picture of the Man, suffering for us. The conjunction hina introduces a clause of purpose. His suffering was not aimless but was designed with a specific object in mind, "to make his people holy."

The verb hagiazo means "to set aside for God;" and it is applied both to things used for ritual purposes and to people who are thus taken out of the circle of the merely worldly and brought into the number of the people of God. This process was effected "through his own blood."

[Biblestudymanuals: but only through a moment of faith alone in Christ alone]

The expression puts some emphasis on the fact that Christ did not need an external victim (as did the high priests) but brought about the sanctification in question by the sacrifice of himself. "Blood" clearly signifies "death," as is commonly the case in the NT—and, for that matter, in the OT. There are some scholars who think the meaning is "life," but this seems untenable (cf. my discussion in ch. 3 of my Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, 3rd ed. [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965]).

"People" can mean people in general; but more characteristically it means "the people of God," a meaning that suits this passage. To effect this purpose, then, Jesus suffered "outside the gate." Though not stated elsewhere in the NT, this is implied in John 19:17; and, anyway, crucifixions took place outside cities. Snell argues from Leviticus 10:1-5; 24:14, 23 that "people were taken 'outside the camp' when they were accursed under the Law and rejected, as much as the ritually useless bodies were after the sacrifice was finished" (in loc.). He goes on to argue that "our Lord's offering has been first compared with that on the Day of Atonement... and is next said to have involved formal rejection by the authorities of the old Judaism" (ibid.). That does seem to be the point of the reference. Jesus was rejected by Jewish authorities, and his death outside Jerusalem symbolized this." '''

3) [(Heb 13:9-14) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:10-14]:

(Heb 13:9 NASB)
"Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

(Heb 13:10 NASB) We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat.

(Heb 13:11 NASB) For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp.

(Heb 13:12 NASB) Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate.

(Heb 13:13 NASB) So, let us go out to Him outside the camp, bearing His reproach.

(Heb 13:14 NASB) For here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come."

'''13:10-14. If those who hawked "strange teachings" tended to idealize the wilderness experience and the tabernacle, the writer's words now make a special point. A Christian has a special altar (probably a figure of speech for the sacrifice of Christ) from which he derives spiritual sustenance. Those who minister at the tabernacle were not entitled to partake of that kind of spiritual food. If some people preferred a desert way of life and considered themselves "servants" of the ancient tabernacle they were, the writer pointed out, debarred from Christian privileges. Under the old institution the blood from sacrifices made on the Day of Atonement was brought into the most holy place, but the bodies were burned outside the camp (v. 11), a location deemed unholy in the years of the wilderness sojourn. But Jesus also suffered outside the city gate (i.e., outside Jerusalem), but the effect of His sacrifice was to make the people holy. Far from association with Him being unholy, as some unbelieving Jews regarded it, the readers were in fact "holy" (or sanctified; cf. 2:11; 10:10, 14) and should not hesitate to share in the disgrace He bore (cf. 12:2) by abandoning the camp of Judaism and identifying with Him. If the readers actually were acquainted with sectarian encampments in their region this exhortation would have had special force. The readers' true home was no camp or city that then existed, but the city that is to come (cf. 11:10, 16; 12:22).'''


E) [(Heb 13:12-16) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:13-16]:

(Heb 13:12 NASB) "Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood', suffered outside the gate.

(Heb 13:13 NASB) So, let us go out to Him outside the camp, bearing His reproach."

[Since Jesus suffered outside the gate of Jerusalem to sanctify the people of Israel (and the whole world, cf. 1 Jn 2:2), let us go out to Him outside the camp - the gate - bearing His reproach in the sense of suffering as we might suffer according to the Sovereignty of God as we are faithful to Him]

(Heb 13:14 NASB) For here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come.

[For we believers - especially Jewish believers in the church age do not yet in this temporal life have a lasting city to be faithful toward, but we look forward to the heavenly New Jerusalem as our dwelling place in the next life and are to be faithful toward that end relative to eternal rewards]

(Heb 13:15 NASB) Through Him then, let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that give thanks to His name.

[So through our Savior Jesus Christ Who sacrificed Himself for our sins and the sins of the whole world, (cf. 1 Jn 2:2); let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is the fruit of our lips let us give thanks to His name]

(Heb 13:16 NASB) And do not neglect doing good and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.

[And let us not neglect doing good and sharing with one another, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.
For Christ's suffering and once for all sacrifice "outside the camp" has changed everything. Now in this time of the church age, God looks to people to follow Christ's way. This means that they offer no animals for sacrifice, for Christ's once for all sacrifice has taken the place of all sacrifices. Now believers are to make their response to what Christ has done for them in praise, good deeds, and works of love and charity.]

1) [(Heb 13:12-16) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:13-16]:

(Heb 13:12 NASB) "Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood', suffered outside the gate.

(Heb 13:13 NASB) So, let us go out to Him outside the camp, bearing His reproach."

['''
13 This leads to an appeal to the readers to "go to him outside the camp" (the compound verb exerchomai, "to go out," and the adverb exo, "outside," emphasize the thought of "out," "outside"). Christ is outside the camp of Judaism, and the readers are encouraged to go to him where he is. To remain within the camp of Judaism would be to be separated from him. Here there may be an allusion to Moses' pitching "the tent of meeting" outside the camp and to the people's going out to it (Exod 33:7). But in the case of Christ, there was a price to pay—that of sharing in the rejection he had undergone, "bearing the disgrace he bore." In 11:26 Moses was said to have accepted "disgrace for the sake of Christ" (the same expression as here). To align oneself with Christ is to subject oneself to scorn, reproach, and perhaps more. But consistently throughout this epistle the writer has argued, as he does here, that it is well worth it. Furthermore, his readers must have a different outlook from that of contemporary Judaism. The Jews held that the way Christ died proved him to be accursed (Deut 21:23; Gal 3:13). The readers must be ready to stand outside Judaism with the Christ who bore the curse for them "outside the camp." ''']

(Heb 13:14 NASB) For here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come.

[
'''14 The writer reinforces his appeal to go to Jesus by reminding Christians that they have no stake in any earthly city, Jewish or otherwise. For people with such an outlook it is no great matter to be "outside the camp." As in 11:10 (where see the comments) the "city" will stand for the highest and best in community life, the heavenly city. That is not to be found "here," i.e., "here on earth." In this sense no earthly city is "enduring." All earthly cities are transient, temporary. But Christians are looking for a city to come. People love to look for earthly security. But the best earthly security is insecure. The readers should pursue that which is really lasting. They should put earnest endeavor (epizeteo; NIV, "we are looking") into striving for the abiding city, not into maintaining their grip on any fleeting earthly one.''']

(Heb 13:15 NASB) Through Him then, let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that give thanks to His name.

['''
15 The verse begins with an emphatic "through him" (NIV apparently tries to add force by substituting "Jesus" for "him"). It is through Jesus and not the Jewish priests (or any other priests) that men offer to God acceptable sacrifice. The verb anaphero is the technical one for the offering of sacrifices of animals and the like. The author uses it of the only sacrifices Christians offer, spiritual sacrifices. So he urges them to offer "a sacrifice of praise" (the expression occurs in LXX in Lev 7:13, 15 and with the definite articles in Lev 7:12), i.e., a sacrifice consisting of praise. The thought that the sacrifice Christians offer is spiritual occurs elsewhere, as in Romans 12:1 (cf. the similar thought that the essence of religion is ethical and spiritual, James 1:27). This sacrifice is to be offered "continually." In systems like Judaism sacrifices were offered at set times, but for Christians praise goes up all the time. Since a loving God is working out his purposes all the time, there are no circumstances in which praise should not be offered (cf. 1 Thess 5:18). The sacrifice is further explained in an expression from Hosea 14:2 (LXX 14:3; cf. Prov 18:20), "the fruit of lips that confess his name." In the light of the Cross, there is no room for sacrifices such as those the Jews offered. Now believers offer the sacrifice of praise and acknowledge Christ.''']

(Heb 13:16 NASB) And do not neglect doing good and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.

['''
16 The writer gives two more examples of the sacrifices Christians offer. "To do good" (eupoiia, only here in the NT and not in the LXX) is a general term, while "fellowship" or "sharing" (koinonia) is more specific. It signifies sharing with others such things as we have: money, goods, and, of course, those intangibles that make up "fellowship." Animal sacrifices were the almost universal religious practice. Christians had nothing of the sort, but the writer is making the point that this did not mean they had nothing to offer. They had their sacrifices, some of which he has listed, and it is "with such sacrifices" that God is well pleased. Christ's suffering "outside the camp" has altered everything. Now God looks to people to take Christ's way. And that means they offer no animals but make their response to what Christ has done for them in praise, good deeds, and works of love and charity.'''

2) [(Heb 13:15-16) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:15-16]:

(Heb 13:15 NASB) Through Him then, let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that give thanks to His name.

(Heb 13:16 NASB) And do not neglect doing good and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.

'''13:15-16. No blood sacrifices were needed in the light of Jesus' death, but to offer... praise and to do good and to share with others were indeed sacrifices that God desired (cf. 10:25).
13:17. If former leaders were to be remembered and their teachings retained (vv. 7-8), present ones were to be obeyed. Their responsibility before God was to be recognized and their shepherding tasks should not be complicated by disobedience. (So that their work will be a joy possibly should be, "so their accounting [to God for you] may be with joy.")'''

IV) [Heb 13:17-25]:

A) [(Heb 13:17) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:17]:

(Heb 13:17 NASB) "Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you."

Believers are commanded to obey their leaders and submit to them - this with the presumption that their leaders are biblical. For example in 1 Tim 3:1-7 Paul wrote to Timothy that a teacher / leader must be husband of one wife, above reproach, sober minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money, manage his household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive; for if someone does not know how to manage his household how could he care for God's church? He must not be a recent convert or he may become puffed up with conceit.

1) [Heb 13:17 Expositer's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:17]:
(Heb 13:17 NASB) "Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you."

'''
I. Christian Obedience (13:17)
The author is mindful of the responsibility of Christian leaders to whom he has already referred (v. 7). In due course they must give account to God for their flock. So he urges his readers to keep this in mind and not make things hard for their leaders.
17 The readers are to be obedient to their leaders. In v. 7 the leaders were men who had died. Here, however, those alive and currently in places of authority are meant. (At the same time we should perhaps notice that there is nothing in the Gr. to correspond to NIV's "their authority"; hypeikete means simply "yield" or "submit," i.e., to them.) NIV omits "for" (gar), which introduces the reason for the submission. The pronoun autoi puts some emphasis on the subject: "They and no one else." The verb "keep watch" (agrypneo) means literally "keep oneself awake, be awake" (BAG, s.v.). There is the imagery of the leaders keeping awake nights in their concern for their people.

"They keep watch over you" is more literally "they keep watch for your souls," where it is a question whether NIV (also NEB) is right and "souls" (psychon) is simply a periphrasis for "you," or whether, as a number of commentators think, the thought is of the spiritual life. In view of the similar use of psyche in 10:39 (lit., "of faith, to the saving of the soul"), it may well be that we are to see here a reference to spiritual well-being. The leaders are concerned for the deep needs of their people, not simply for what lies on the surface. They are concerned, because they must render account. Leaders are responsible, and God will call them to account one day. The writer pleads that the readers will so act that keeping watch will be a thing of joy for the leaders (Paul could speak of the Thessalonians as his "glory and joy": 1 Thess 2:20; cf. Philippians 2:16; 3 John 4). The alternative is for them to do it with "groaning" (stenazontes; NIV, "a burden"), which, he says, would be "of no advantage" for the readers.

2) [(Heb 13:17) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:17]:

(Heb 13:17 NASB) "Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you."

'''13:17. If former leaders were to be remembered and their teachings retained (vv. 7-8), present ones were to be obeyed. Their responsibility before God was to be recognized and their shepherding tasks should not be complicated by disobedience. (So that their work will be a joy possibly should be, "so their accounting [to God for you] may be with joy.")'''

B) [(Heb 13:18-19) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 3:18-19)]:

(Heb 13:18 NASB) "Pray for us, for we are sure that we have a good conscience, desiring to conduct ourselves honorably in all things.

(Heb 13:19 NASB) And I urge you all the more to do this, so that I may be restored to you the sooner."

The author of Hebrews requests / commands his readers to pray for himself and his entourage. For the author assures them that he and his group "have a good conscience, desiring to conduct ourselves honorably in all things." This indicates that there was a question as to the author's honorability - which he resolves by declaring that he has a good conscience and honorable conduct - his integrity. Furthermore, the author urges them to pray all the more so that they be restored - to them sooner indicating prior visit(s) to continue their ministry to them.

1) [(Heb 13:18-19) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:18-19)]:

(Heb 13:18 NASB) "Pray for us, for we are sure that we have a good conscience, desiring to conduct ourselves honorably in all things.

(Heb 13:19 NASB) And I urge you all the more to do this, so that I may be restored to you the sooner.

'''J. Prayer (13:18-19)
A short appeal for prayer reveals both the writer's conviction that prayer is a powerful force and his hope that he will soon see his correspondents again. Following immediately on the reference to the leaders, this leads a number of commentators to see the writer as one who had once been a leader in the group. His desire to "be restored to you" (v. 19) shows clearly that he had once worked among them in some capacity.

18 The present imperative "Pray" (proseuchesthe) looks for a continuous activity and implies that they had already been doing this. "Keep praying for us" is its force. There is a question whether we should take the plural "us" as a genuine plural or as epistolary, meaning "I" (as in 5:11; 6:9, 11). The plural in this verse is followed by a singular in v. 19, and exactly opposite conclusions have been drawn from this. Westcott and Kent (in loc.), for example, think the plural genuine and that the writer associates others with him (for a similar transition from plural to singular, cf. Gal 1:8-9; Col 4:3). But Bruce and Hewitt (in loc.) think that the singular shows the plural to be no more than literary. I see no reason for thinking that others are associated with the writer, so I incline to this latter view.

The writer has rebuked his readers from time to time; he has warned them of the dangers in their conduct and exhorted them. But he depends on them, too, and looks to them now to support him with their prayers. At the same time there is a problem arising from the way he puts his request. He says, "Pray for us, for we are persuaded that we have a good conscience" (NIV omits the "for" [gar]; this makes it a separate statement and thus eliminates the problem). Having a good conscience is a most unusual reason for requesting prayer. We could understand it if the writer spoke of his difficulties or the like. Lacking knowledge of the circumstances, we cannot be sure. Yet it seems that the readers have been accusing the writer of some fault. Moffatt suggests that they may have attributed his absence from them to unworthy motives (in loc.). Something had gone wrong. The writer protests that he has a clear conscience and that this is a reason for asking for their fellowship in prayer.

The adjective "good" (kalen) is applied to conscience only here in the NT (elsewhere we find agathe). The writer is not aware of having committed any sin. He goes on to affirm his determination "to live honorably" (the adverb is kalos) and that "in every way." He allows no exceptions but expresses wholeheartedness. "Desire" is perhaps a little weak for thelontes, for the verb expresses the set of the will, not merely a wish. The writer professes a firm determination to live in the way indicated.

19 The author underlines the importance of the readers' doing as he asks. He appeals (parakalo, NIV, "urge") strongly, where the adverb perissoteros (which NIV renders "particularly") means something like "more abundantly," "beyond measure." What it was that prevented him from being "restored" to them is not said, but evidently the obstacle was considerable. Some have suggested that he had been imprisoned for his faith. We know too little of the circumstances to rule this out, but there is nothing to indicate it. Others think it was sickness. We simply do not know. The language seems to show that it was something outside the writer's control and that it needed a good deal of prayer. The problem was with the writer, not the readers, because he specifically asks for prayer for himself.'''

2) [(Heb 13:18-19) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:18-19]:

(Heb 13:18 NASB) "Pray for us, for we are sure that we have a good conscience, desiring to conduct ourselves honorably in all things.

(Heb 13:19 NASB) And I urge you all the more to do this, so that I may be restored to you the sooner."

"13:18-19. With that same sense of spiritual humility that led him to use "we" in most of his warning sections, the writer requested the prayers of his readers, and particularly that he might be restored to them soon. His interest in them was personal, and he was eager to see them.

C) [(Heb 13:20) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:20]:

(Heb 13:20 NASB) "Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,"

The author of Hebrews in the form of a prayer and benediction writes, "Now the God of peace, Who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep - referring to the Son of God, even Jesus Christ our Lord - the sheep referring most specifically to the Hebrew Christians and also to all those who have believed in Christ throughout the ages - through the blood of the eternal covenant referring to the covenant between God and the house of Israel and the house of Judah yet benefitting ALL of those throughout the ages who trust in Christ's sacrifice for the sins of the whole world  - each in his / her own way according to the sovereignty of God.

1) [(Heb 13:20) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:20]:

(Heb 13:20 NASB) "Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,"

'''20 God is called "the God of peace" a number of times in the Pauline writings (Rom 15:33; 16:20; 2Cor 13:11; Philippians 4:9; 1 Thess 5:23). "Peace" connotes the fullest prosperity of the whole man, taking up as it does the OT concept of the Hebrew salom (see comments on 7:2). Here it reminds us that it is God in whom all our prosperity is centered. There is no well-rounded life that does not depend on him. The expression is especially suitable in view of what the epistle discloses of the condition of the readers. They have had to cope with some form of persecution and were still not free from opposition. They were tempted to go back from Christianity and have had to be warned of the dangers of apostasy. They may have had doubts about who their true leaders were. It is well for them to be reminded that real peace is in God.
The doxology goes on to characterize God in terms of the Resurrection. In the NT, Jesus is occasionally said to have risen. It is, however, much more common in the NT for the Resurrection to be ascribed to God, as here (though the verb artago is not common in this connection). The one whom God brought up from the dead is now described as "the great Shepherd of the sheep." The language seems to be derived from Isaiah 63:11—"Where is he who brought them through the sea, with the shepherd of his flock?"—though the thought here is, of course, quite different. Christ is called a shepherd in the great treatment of the shepherd theme in John 10 and again in 1 Peter 2:25 (cf. also Matt 26:31; Mark 14:27). It is a piece of imagery that stresses the care of our Lord for his own, for sheep are helpless without their shepherd. But an aspect we in modern times sometimes miss is that the shepherd has absolute sovereignty over his flock (cf. Rev 2:27; 12:5; 19:15; in each case the verb rendered "rule" in NIV means "to shepherd"). The adjective "great" is used because Christ is not to be ranked with other shepherds. He stands out.

The Resurrection is linked with "the blood of the eternal covenant" (cf. Isa 55:3; Zech 9:11). It is interesting to see how the thought of covenant persists to the end. It has been one of the major themes of this epistle. The adjective again brings out the point that this covenant will never be replaced by another as it replaced the old covenant. It is perpetual in its validity. And it was established by blood. The author never forgets that. For him the death of Jesus is central. At the same time, his linking it with the Resurrection shows that he did not have in mind a dead Christ but one who, though he shed his blood to establish the covenant, lives for ever. Last in this verse in the Greek (and with some emphasis) come the words "our Lord Jesus." The expression is unusual outside of Acts, where it occurs a number of times. It combines the lordship of Christ and his real humanity, two themes of continuing importance.'''


C cont.) [(Heb 13:20-21) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:20-21, (cont.)]:

(Heb 13:20 NASB) "Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,

(Heb 13:21 NASB) equip you in every good thing to do His will, working in us that which is pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen."

So Heb 13:20 continues into Heb 13:21 as a prayer request for believers to be equipped in every good thing to do His [God's] will, that God will work in them that which is pleasing in His sight, which work is through Jesus Christ, to Whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen.
Notice that the glory of the godly work that we believers volunteer of our own free will to do is nevertheless the work of God in them to the glory of and through Jesus Christ for which we receive rewards in heaven for doing!!!! Amen. For it is the work of God the Holy Spirit directing the willing and obedient mind of His child in the steps to take to do God's will. All of this which includes the willing study of God's Word.

2) [(Heb 13:21) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:21]:

(Heb 13:20 NASB)
"Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,

(Heb 13:21 NASB) equip you in every good thing to do His will, working in us that which is pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen."

''' 21 The prayer is that God will "equip" the readers "with everything good for doing his will." The verb "equip" (katartizo) is often used of mending what is broken and torn, and some see a reference to putting right what was amiss in the spiritual life of the readers. A prayer that God would put things right would be quite in place. But in this context perhaps the meaning is "supply you with what you need to live the Christian life"; so NIV gives the right meaning. "Everything good" is comprehensive. The writer wants nothing to be lacking. Notice the emphasis on doing the will of God, a thought we have had before in this epistle.
It is also interesting to notice the juxtaposition of "doing his will" and "may he work in us." From one point of view a deed is the deed of man, but from another it is God working in and through his servant. We should not overlook the significance of the word "us." As he has done so often, the writer links himself with his readers. He looks for God to do his perfect work in them and in him alike. He is not aloof and a special case; he needs the grace of God as much as they do. He wants God to do in us "what is pleasing to him," where "pleasing" (euarestos) renders a word used only here in Hebrews but eight times elsewhere in the NT. In Titus 2:9 it refers to slaves being pleasing to their masters; elsewhere it always refers to people being acceptable to God. But men can do what is acceptable to God only through Jesus Christ. Therefore, the prayer includes this point.

Whether "to whom" refers to the Father or to Christ poses a problem. Grammatically it could be either. A number of commentators take it to refer to God on the ground that ho theos is the subject of the main verb and that in any case doxologies mostly refer to him. Others point out that "Jesus Christ" immediately precedes the word in question and that in any case this epistle puts emphasis on Christ and his work for men. So it seems that a good case can be made for either. I do not see how the question can be resolved. Perhaps the writer was not making a sharp distinction.

The doxology concludes with "for ever and ever. Amen." A number of important MSS omit the words "and ever." It is the kind of addition scribes would naturally insert if it was lacking in the text before them. There seems, however, to be no reason for anyone to omit it if it were original; so the shorter reading should probably be preferred. It is curious that doxologies should include "Amen," as this one does, for the word was normally the response of a congregation. Perhaps initially a doxology was spoken by the leader of a congregation and the people responded with their "Amen." In time the response was added to the doxology, as being the normal thing. Be that as it may, the "Amen" makes a satisfying close.'''

3) [(Heb 13:20-21) Bible Knowledge Commentary On Heb 13:20-21]:

(Heb 13:20 NASB) "Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,

(Heb 13:21 NASB) equip you in every good thing to do His will, working in us that which is pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen."

'''13:20-21. In a lovely benediction which captures a number of the major themes of the epistle (e.g., peace, blood, covenant, Resurrection, Shepherd, equip), the writer expressed confidence in our Lord Jesus as the Great Shepherd of New-Covenant people, through whom God was able to effect His will (equip is katartisai, "to prepare, make ready for use"; cf. Eph. 4:12) in the readers and in himself. This indeed is what he prayed for his readers.'''

[Biblestudymanuals Commentary on "New-Covenant people" above]:

The phrase rendered, "The New-Covenant people" refers to that generation of Israel - yet to be discovered in history who will all to a man express a moment of faith alone in Christ alone unto immediate possession of eternal life, live upward to 1,000 years, transformed into perfect beings and know God's Word perfectly, and corule the earth with Christ; albeit all individuals throughout the ages who express that same trust will benefit with eternal life .

D) [(Heb 13:22-25) Biblestudymanuals Commentary On Heb 13:22-25]:


(Heb 13:22 NASB) But I urge you, brethren, bear with this word of exhortation, for I have written to you briefly.

(Heb 13:23 NASB) Take notice that our brother Timothy has been released, with whom, if he comes soon, I will see you.

(Heb 13:24 NASB) Greet all of your leaders and all the saints. Those from Italy greet you.

(Heb 13:25 NASB) Grace be with you all."

So to end his letter to the Hebrew Christians, the author urges his brethren, i.e., fellow Jewish Christians to bear his exhortations to them in the sense of to accept and obey what the author is relaying to them as valid & true and persevere in the faith accordingly. The author further exhorts them to take notice the phrase rendered "our brother Timothy" in the sense of being in the faith, i.e., a believer. Timothy has been released evidently from captivity and will  accompany
him when the author comes to see them if Timothy comes soon. If not, the author will visit them without Timothy. Then he goes on to write and tell them to greet all of your leaders and all the saints implying that the recipient of this letter was someone else besides the leaders and all the saints but is intended perhaps for them too. And he adds "Those [believers]  from Italy greet you." Finally, he closes the letter with "Grace be with you all," that all of those whom he is addressing, i.e., the Hebrew Christians and for that matter all believers - God's unmerited favor - blessings - be upon them all. The greetings show that the epistle was being sent to a definite, known group of Christians with whom the author had ties.

1) [(Heb 13:22-25) Expositor's Bible Commentary On Heb 13:22-25]:

(Heb 13:22 NASB) "But I urge you, brethren, bear with this word of exhortation, for I have written to you briefly.

(Heb 13:23 NASB) Take notice that our brother Timothy has been released, with whom, if he comes soon, I will see you.

(Heb 13:24 NASB) Greet all of your leaders and all the saints. Those from Italy greet you.

(Heb 13:25 NASB) Grace be with you all."

"B. Final Exhortations (13:22-25)

The author now rounds off the whole epistle with a final appeal and a brief section of greetings. The greetings show that the epistle was being sent to a definite, known group of Christians with whom the author had ties.

22 "I urge" (NIV, NASB) may be the right way to translate parakalo; but it seems to mean something more like "I beg you" (TEV, NEB; cf. "I do ask you, brothers, to take these words of advice kindly" [JB]). There is appeal in it, but also encouragement. The letter has had its share of rebukes and stern warnings, and the writer now softens the impact a little with this appeal and with the affectionate address "Brothers." He calls his epistle the "word of exhortation" ("my" is inserted by NIV, RSV). A similar expression is found in Acts 13:15, where it clearly means a homily. So the point of it here may be that this letter is rather like a written sermon. "Exhortation" (parakleseos) includes the note of encouragement as elsewhere in the letter. It contains a good deal of exhortation here; but the writer means it as encouragement, not as rebuke.

The author goes on to say that he has written only briefly. Some commentators think that such a description can scarcely apply to an epistle as long as this one and so suggest that perhaps chapter 13 (or part of it) was added to some previously existing writing and that this expression refers only to the "addition." Against that it is hard to see why anyone would bother to apologize for writing anything as short as this chapter. It is better to see it as applying to the whole. For the letter is short, considering the subject matter. Some of the subjects could have been dealt with at much greater length. There has been some straight speaking. So before he finishes, the writer adds this brief section inviting the readers to take it in the right spirit. It would all be much worse if they did not.

23 "I want you to know" renders the word ginoskete, which could be either indicative, "you know," or imperative, "Know!" On the whole it seems more likely to be the latter (as implied by "I want you to know"), for the writer is evidently giving some new information, whereas the indicative would mean that he was repeating something they already knew (why would he do so?). Timothy is no doubt the companion of Paul (no other Timothy is known to us from those times) and he seems to have had some ties with both the readers and the writer. Otherwise we would expect a general expression instead of "our brother Timothy."

It is not clear what "released" means, for the word can refer to starting off on a journey (as in Acts 13:3; 28:25) or making other beginnings. Timothy may have started on a journey or he may have been released from some obligation. But on the whole it seems most likely that the term, used absolutely as it is, means that he had been released from imprisonment. All that we can say for certain is that Timothy had left the place where he was. The writer now expected that he would come to the place where Timothy was and hoped that then the two of them might go on to visit the readers. But evidently he intended moving fairly soon, whether or not Timothy came.

24 For the third time in the chapter, the leaders come to our attention. That they are to be greeted by the recipients of the letter makes it clear that the "leaders" were not the recipients and, furthermore, that the letter was not sent to the whole church. That greetings were to be sent shows that the recipients were on good terms with the leaders. The words "and all" may be significant—viz., there are no exceptions. "The saints" (hoi hagioi, NIV, "God's people") is a common NT description of the people of God, but it is found in this epistle again only in 6:10. It means God's people as those consecrated to him, set apart to do him service. The greeting from "those from Italy" raises the question whether they were Italians living abroad or in their own country. The words could mean either. (Acts 10:23 has a similar expression for those still living in their homeland and Acts 21:27 for those living away from their homeland.) There seems no way of determining the point.

25 The NT letters normally end with a prayer for grace for the recipients. Grace is a fitting note on which to end a letter like this one, so full of what God has done for people in Christ. There are some variant readings, but NIV has the text that most agree is correct. The author then closes by praying for God's grace for all his friends. He omits none from his concern or from God's."

2) [(Heb 13:22-25) Bible Knowledge Bible Commentary On Heb 13:22-25]:

(Heb 13:22 NASB) "But I urge you, brethren, bear with this word of exhortation, for I have written to you briefly.

(Heb 13:23 NASB) Take notice that our brother Timothy has been released, with whom, if he comes soon, I will see you.

(Heb 13:24 NASB) Greet all of your leaders and all the saints. Those from Italy greet you.

(Heb 13:25 NASB) Grace be with you all."


"13:22-25. Urging once again that his readers bear with his word of exhortation, he expressed the hope that he and Timothy would soon see them. After giving them greetings, he committed them to God's grace."