CREATIONISM VS EVOLUTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I) INTRODUCTION

A) ONLY TWO POSITIONS TO CHOOSE FROM: CREATIONISM OR EVOLUTION

B) BOTH IDEAS HAVE RELIGIOUS IMPLICATIONS

C) DEFINING TERMS IS CRITICAL IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE TRUTH ABOUT ORIGINS

1) VARIATION WITHIN A SPECIES IS NOT THE SAME AS EVOLUTION

2) SCIENCE'S DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT SPECIES DOES NOT ALWAYS REFLECT REALITY

D) SCIENTIFIC PROOF DEMANDS OBSERVABILITY, EXPERIMENTABILITY, REPEATABILITY AND FALSIFIABILITY

II) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY & PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF RECENT CREATION

A) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY & PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE UNIVERSE

1) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF A RECENTLY CREATED UNIVERSE

DETAILED INDEX OF THIS SECTION

2) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A RECENTLY CREATED UNIVERSE

a) INTRODUCTION

b) YOUNG AGE OF THE STARS

c) PLANETS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM APPEAR TO BE YOUNG

i) FACTS ABOUT PLANETS AND MOONS

ii) SATURN'S RINGS CANNOT BE MORE THAN 10,000 YEARS OLD

iii) CRATERS ON VENUS ARE VIRTUALLY UNDISTURBED INDICATING A YOUNG PLANET

d) THE SUN IS YOUNG

e) THE MOON IS YOUNG

f) EXISTENCE OF COMETS SUPPORTS RECENTLY CREATED UNIVERSE

B) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY & PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM EARTH WHICH TESTIFY TO A RECENT CREATION

1) INTRODUCTION

2) INITIAL CREATION ACT EFFECTED THE BEGINNING OF PROFOUNDLY SIGNIFICANT GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ALL OF WHICH ARE RECENT

a) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF THE INITIAL CREATION STAGE OF THE EARTH

DETAILED INDEX OF THIS SECTION

b) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM EARTH SUPPORTING INITIAL CREATION

1) EARTH'S ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD INDICATES RECENT CREATION

3) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY THAT THE FINAL WORK OF CREATION PRODUCED ALL LIFEFORMS & ORIGINAL FORMATIONS IN DAYS - ALL OF WHICH ARE RECENT

DETAILED INDEX OF THIS SECTION

4) THE PREFLOOD PERIOD - AFTER THE FALL

a) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF THE EFFECT OF THE FALL

DETAILED INDEX OF THIS SECTION

b) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECT OF THE FALL

1) INTRODUCTION

2) PREFLOOD LAND, OCEAN AND CLIMATE DIFFERENT

3) THERE WAS LITTLE VOLCANIC OR TECTONIC ACTIVITY

4) THERE WAS UNIVERSALLY WARM PREFLOOD CLIMATE

5) FLOOD REQUIRED A UNIQUE RAINFALL SOURCE

a) INTRODUCTION

b) THE FIRMAMENT CANOPY AROUND THE EARTH

c) FUTURE RESTORATION OF THE CANOPY

FLOOD

5) PERIOD OF THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD

a) INTRODUCTION

THE FLOOD

b) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD

1) INTRODUCTION

2) SCRIPTURE DESCRIBES FLOOD: CATASTROPHIC/WORLDWIDE - NOT BOUND BY TODAY'S NORMATIVE PROCESSES

a) FRESH OLIVE LEAF WHICH DOVE RETRIEVED DOES NOT INDICATE A TRANQUIL FLOOD AS CRITICS MAINTAIN

b) MARINE LIFE SURVIVED THE FLOOD

c) PLANT LIFE SURVIVED THE FLOOD

3) BIBLE FLOOD ACCOUNT IS ORIGINAL & NOT DERIVED FROM THE BABYLONIAN MYTH AS CRITICS MAINTAIN

a) BIBLE ACCOUNT & BABYLONIAN MYTH: TOO DIFFERENT TO PROVE DERIVATION

i) THE 'gods' OF THE BABYLONIAN FLOOD ARE NOT THE ONE TRUE GOD OF THE BIBLE

ii) ANNOUNCEMENT OF BABYLONIAN FLOOD KEPT SECRET

iii) THE BABYLONIAN ARK & ITS OCCUPANTS ARE DIFFERENT

iv) CAUSES & DURATION OF BABYLONIAN FLOOD DIFFERENT

v) THE BIRD SCENES ARE DIFFERENT

vi) THE SACRIFICE & BLESSING ARE DIFFERENT

b) SUMMARY: THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNT IN GENESIS IS ORIGINAL

4)TERMS DESCRIBING THE FLOOD IN SCRIPTURE ARE UNIVERSAL

a) SCRIPTURE, BEING INSPIRED BY GOD IS TO BE TAKEN IN CONTEXT IN THE LITERAL SENSE AUTHORS INTENDED

b) CONTEXT OF THE FLOOD ACCOUNT IN SCRIPTURE DEMANDS LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF 'ALL AND 'EVERY'

c) PHYSICAL PHENOMENA OF THE FLOOD AS DESCRIBED IN SCRIPTURE: MEANINGLESS IF NOT LITERALLY INTERPRETED

5) THE RAIN AND FLOODING WERE NOT GRADUAL AND SHORT-LIVED AS CRITICS MAINTAIN

6) THE DESTRUCTION OF A WIDELY-DISTRIBUTED HUMAN RACE IS INDICATED IN SCRIPTURE

a) FLOOD'S STATED PURPOSE: PUNISHMENT OF HUMAN RACE

b) SCRIPTURE TESTIFIES THAT OF THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE ONLY NOAH & HIS FAMILY SURVIVED

c) GOD'S COVENANT WITH NOAH: TOTAL DESTRUCTION

d) HUMANITY NOT LIMITED TO THE MESOPOTAMIAN VALLEY

i) LONGEVITY & FERTILITY OF EARLY MAN = LARGE WORLDWIDE POPULATION

ii) MANKIND'S INHERENT VIOLENT NATURE SPREAD HUMANITY WORLDWIDE

iii) NOAH'S PREACHING REACHED THRUOUT WORLD AIDED BY A UNIFORM LANGUAGE & NOAH'S UNIQUE & SENSATIONAL ARK BUILDING VENTURE LASTING MORE THAN 100 YRS

iv) CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES WOULD PREACH THE GOSPEL NOT THE FLOOD

e) EVIDENCE OF ANCIENT INDIANS IN AMERICA DOES NOT PROVE A LOCAL FLOOD

f) ALL RACES DID COME FROM NOAH

i) THE TABLE OF NATIONS

ii) THE BIBLE AND RACIAL DISTRIBUTION

iii) RECENT MIGRATIONS ASIA SUPPORT THEORY OF RAPID DISPERSION OF HUMANITY

iv) INNUMERABLE WORLDWIDE TRADITIONS OF UNIVERSAL FLOOD SUPPORT RAPID MIGRATION OF MANKIND

g) SUMMARY

THE ARK

@@@indxa: THE ARK

7) THE NEED FOR AN ARK POINTS TO A UNIVERSAL DELUGE NOT A LOCAL ONE

a) THE SIZE OF THE ARK: BUILT FOR A WORLDWIDE DELUGE

b) THE ARK ACTUALLY WAS CAPABLE AND DID SUSTAIN ALL THE ANIMALS INDICATED

c) GATHERING THE ANIMALS TO THE ARK

i) DIFFERENT CLIMATIC & ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS BEFORE THE FLOOD

ii) MIGRATORY INSTINCTS OF THE ANIMAL WORLD USED SUPERNATURALLY BY GOD TO BRING ANIMALS INTO ARK

d) FITTING ANIMALS INTO THE ARK

i) CRITICS MULTIPLY THE SPECIES

ii) CAPACITY FOR VARIETY WITHIN EACH 'KIND' REDUCES THE NUMBER NEEDED IN THE ARK

e) CARING FOR THE ANIMALS IN THE ARK

i) HIBERNATION: LATENT CAPACITY OF ANIMALS & BIRDS

ii) GOD'S SUPERNATURAL USE OF HIBERNATION

iii) SUFFICIENT DRINKING WATER AVAILABLE

iv) SUFFICIENT AIR TO BREATHE AVAILABLE

f) NATURAL & SUPERNATURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLOOD INCLUDE ANIMALS IN THE ARK

g) THE ARK WAS NOT DESTROYED BY VIOLENT SEAS AS CRITICS MAINTAIN WOULD HAVE HAPPENED

@@@indxa.htm

8) TESTIMONY OF PETER: THE WHOLE WORLD WAS DESTROYED

9) DEPTH OF THE FLOOD = THE WHOLE EARTH WAS COVERED

10) DURATION OF THE FLOOD INDICATES A WORLDWIDE FLOOD

a) INTRODUCTION

b) 150 DAYS OF PREVAILING FLOODS

c) 221 DAYS OF ASSUAGING WATERS

11) EMERGENCE OF TODAY'S TOPOGRAPHY AFTER THE FLOOD

a) SUPERNATURAL WINDS

b) ISOSTATIC READJUSTMENTS IN THE EARTH

c) RISE OF THE CONTINENTS

12) THE DATE OF THE FLOOD

a) THE FLOOD CANNOT BE DATED BY ADDING UP THE YEARS STATED IN CHRONOLOGIES IN SCRIPTURE

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) THE YEARS GIVEN IN GENESIS 11 ARE NOT COMPLETE

iii) CAINAN APPEARS IN LUKE'S CHRONOLOGY AND NOT IN GENESIS 11's CHRONOLOGY

iv) SYMMETRICAL ARRANGEMENT OF CHRONOLOGIES INDICATES THAT THEY ARE NOT ALL INCLUSIVE

v) THE BIBLE'S CHRONOLOGIES TEACH SUBJECTS OTHER THAN A STRICT SEQUENCE OF HISTORY

vi) THE BIBLE'S CHRONOLOGIES DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH TIME FOR THE FLOOD IF INTERPRETED AS CONTINUOUS

vii) STRICT CHRONOLOGY FORCES THE TOWER OF BABEL INTO ABRAHAM'S TIME

viii) MANY INDIVIDUALS IN BIBLICAL CHRONOLOGIES ARE NOT TO BE COUNTED AS FIRST BORN SONS

ix) 'BEGAT' IN THE BIBLE'S CHRONOLOGIES OFTEN REFERS TO MORE THAN ONE GENERATION

x) SUMMARY

b) THE FLOOD CANNOT BE DATED BY INSERTING CENTURIES INTO THE CHRONOLOGIES

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) THE BIBLE'S CHRONOLOGIES CANNOT BE EXTENDED OVER 10'S OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS

iii) TOWER OF BABEL CANNOT BE 10 THOUSAND + YRS OLD

iv) THE SO-CALLED 'STONE AGE' IS NOT HISTORICALLY AND BIBLICALLY POSSIBLE

v) ANCIENT FLOOD FOLKLORE COULD NOT BE 10'S OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OLD

vi) CONCLUSION

c) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD

1) GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF TODAY'S EARTH IS CATASTROPHIC IN NATURE - NOT UNIFORMITARIAN

a) UNIFORMITARIANISM = PRESENT IS THE KEY TO THE PAST

b) FALSE PRESUPPOSITION OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION

c) THE PRESUPPOSED GEOLOGIC TIME-TABLE

2) EARTH FLOODED BY SUBTERRANEAN WATERS & TORRENTIAL DOWNPOUR

a) INTRODUCTION

b) DESTRUCTIVE POWER OF MODERN RIVER FLOODS

c) DESTRUCTIVE POWER OF OCEAN WAVES

d) TREMENDOUS EROSION FROM FLOOD'S RAINFALL

3) MASSIVE WORLDWIDE VOLCANIC, SEISMIC AND TIDAL WAVEACTIVITY INDICATED

a) INTRODUCTION

b) EVIDENCES PAST VOLCANISM TESTIFY WORLDWIDE FLOOD

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) EVIDENCE OF PAST VOLCANISM CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY UNIFORMITARIANISM

c) EVIDENCES OF PAST EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY TESTIFY TO A WORLDWIDE FLOOD

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) EVIDENCE OF MASSIVE MOVEMENTS IN THE EARTH'S CRUST CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY UNIFORMITARIANISM

4) UNPRECEDENTED SEDIMENTARY ACTIVITY POINTS TO FLOOD

a) INTRODUCTION

b) SEDIMENTARY STRATA CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY UNIFORMITARIANISM

c) INNUMERABLE GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY UNIFORMITARIANISM

i) PENEPLAINS

ii) DRY WATER FALLS & CANYONS

iii) FLUVIATILE PLAINS & ALLUVIAL SLOPES

iv) LARGE, HIGH PLATEAUS AND SPECTACULAR CANYONS WITH UNIFORM HORIZONTAL STRATA

v) SINUOUS, MEANDERING RIVERS AT CANYON BOTTOMS

vi) 'ANACHRONISTIC' MOUNTAIN STRATA

vii) CORAL REEFS

viii) DEEP-SEA SEDIMENTS

ix) EVAPORITE BEDS

x) CAVE DEPOSITS: STALACTITES & STALAGMITES

xi) BURIED FORESTS

xii) VARVED CLAY DEPOSITS

xiii) OIL DEPOSITS

xiv) ORE AND MINERAL DEPOSITS

xv) RIPPLES IN THE STRATA

5) PALEONTOLOGY = A STUDY OF FOSSILS RELATIVE TO THE ORIGIN OF LIFE POINTS TO A WORLDWIDE FLOOD

a) INTRODUCTION

i) STROMATOLITES - CREATED BY GOD DURING CREATION WEEK

b) FLOOD PROVIDED IDEAL CONDITIONS FOR FOSSILS

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) FOSSILS WHICH ARE THE PRESERVATION OF THE ENTIRE ORGANISM BY FREEZING

iii) FOSSILS WHICH ARE THE PRESERVATION OF JUST THE HARD PARTS OF THE ORGANISM

iv) FOSSILS WHICH ARE THE PRESERVATION OF JUST THE CARBON ('CARBONIZATION' = COAL)

v) FOSSILS WHICH ARE THE PRESERVATION OF JUST THE ORIGINAL FORM IN CASTS OR MOLDS

vi) PETRIFIED FOSSILS

vii) PRESERVATION OF ANIMAL AND HUMAN TRACKS

c) HYDRODYNAMIC SELECTIVITY OF MOVING WATER RE: FOSSIL DEPOSITS AND SEDIMENTATION RULES OUT EVOLUTION & POINTS TO A RECENT CATASTROPHIC FLOOD

d) EARLY BURIAL OF MARINE CREATURES

e) LATER BURIAL OF LAND ANIMALS AND PLANTS

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) HIGHER MOBILITY OF THE VERTEBRATES

iii) FORMATION OF COAL BEDS: A PRODUCT OF MASSIVE SHORT TERM SEDIMENTARY ACTIVITY

iv) THE 'MESOZOIC' STRATA-DINOSAUR

v) FINAL FLOOD DEPOSIT - MAMMAL FOSSILS

f) LIVING FOSSILS (GEOLOGIC TABLE)

g) SUMMARY RE: FOSSILS

6) THE AMOUNT OF WATER ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH TESTIFIES TO THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD

a) INTRODUCTION

b) ENCLOSED LAKE BASINS AND RAISED BEACHES TESTIFY TO MUCH MORE WATER IN THE PAST

c) EVIDENCE OF MUCH GREATER RIVER ACTIVITY IN THE PAST

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) DRY STREAM CHANNELS

iii) CERTAIN SAND & GRAVEL DEPOSITS INDICATE FORMER EXISTENCE OF GREAT RIVERS

iv) VALLEYS & RIVERS EVIDENCE MUCH GREATER RIVER ACTIVITY IN THE PAST

v) RAISED RIVER TERRACES EVIDENCE HIGHER LEVELS & VOLUMES OF STREAM RUN-OFF

d) EVIDENCE OF FORMER LOWER SEA LEVELS

6) THE POST FLOOD PERIOD

a) INTRODUCTION

b) RAPID WORLDWIDE DISPERSION OF MAN, ANIMALS & PLANTS WAS POSSIBLE AFTER THE FLOOD

1) THREE MAJOR VIEWS ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN THE PRESENT WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS

2) UNIQUENESS OF AUSTRALIAN MARSUPIALS DOESN'T CONTRADICT WORLDWIDE ANIMAL DISPERSION AFTER FLOOD

3) RAPID ANIMAL DISPERSION IN RECENT HISTORY SUPPORTS WORLDWIDE ANIMAL MIGRATION FROM THE ARK

c) EVIDENCE OF AN ICE AGE POINTS TO A RECENT CATASTROPHIC WORLDWIDE FLOOD

1) ONSET OF THE ICE AGE

a) INTRODUCTION

b) EVIDENCE FOR ONLY ONE ICE AGE

c) EVIDENCE OF CONTINENTAL ICE SHEETS CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY UNIFORMITARIANISM

2) END OF THE ICE AGE

a) SUDDEN WARMING OF THE CLIMATE

b) ABUNDANT CARBON DIOXIDE PRODUCED PLANT GROWTH & RISE IN EARTH'S TEMPERATURE, ENDING THE ICE AGE

3) SUMMARY: ICE AGE: UNIQUE POST FLOOD SHORT TERM EVENT

d) TREE RINGS INDICATE A RECENT CATASTROPHIC FLOOD & RECENT CREATION

e) HISTORICAL RECORDS INDICATE A RECENT CIVILIZATION NOT AN OLD EVOLVED ONE

f) THE WORLD'S POPULATION TESTIFIES TO A YOUNG EARTH

g) CONTINUING CATASTROPHIC ACTIVITY TODAY CONTRADICTS UNIFORMITARIANISM

h) VASE FOUND IN 'PREHISTORIC ROCK' INDICATES CIVILIZATION HAS ALWAYS BEEN EXTANT - POINTING TO A RECENT CREATION WHICH ALWAYS INCLUDED MANKIND

7) CONCLUSION: TODAY'S GEOLOGY EXPLAINED BY A CATASTROPHIC UNIVERSAL FLOOD NOT EVOLUTION

8) METHODS OF AGE MEASUREMENT INDICATE A YOUNG EARTH

a) INTRODUCTION

b) RADIOACTIVITY AGE MEASUREMENTS

1) INTRODUCTION

2) METHODS OF RADIOACTIVITY AGE MEASUREMENT

a) SUMMARY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF RADIOACTIVE DECAY

b) ALPHA-DECAY & THE POTENTIAL BARRIER

c) EXTERNAL ENERGY SOURCES

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) COSMIC RADIATION

iii) THE VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELT

d) LEAD AGE METHODS

i) DEFECTIVE METHODS AND FAULTY INTERPRETATIONS CAUSE ERRONEOUS RESULTS

ii) ORIGINAL LEAD NOT CONSIDERED IN RADIOACTIVE AGE DETERMINATIONS RESULTING IN FALSE CONCLUSIONS

iii) LEACHING OF LEAD OR URANIUM RESULTS IN RADICALLY INCORRECT DETERMINATIONS

iv) METHODS WHICH COMPENSATE FOR SHORT COMINGS IN THE AGE METHOD FAIL COMPLETELY

v) LEAD ISOTOPE METHODS ARE NOT ACCURATE EITHER

vi) OTHER LEAD AGE METHODS ARE NOT ACCURATE

vii)CONCLUSIONS ON ACCURACY OF LEAD AGE METHODS

e) RUBIDIUM METHOD

f) POTASSIUM METHOD

g) RADIOACTIVE CARBON METHOD

i) INTRODUCTION

ii) FALSE ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN CARBON DATING METHOD

iii) PREFLOOD CARBON 14 PROPORTIONS NOT FACTORED IN

iv) POSTFLOOD CARBON 14 PROPORTIONS HIGHER

3) CONCLUSIONS: RADIOACTIVE DATING METHODS

a) UNRELIABLE DATA

b) FALSE ASSUMPTIONS

i) INTRODUCTION

ii)PRESUPPOSITION: DECAY RATES ARE UNIFORM: WRONG!

iii) AGREEMENT OF DATA FROM DIFFERENT METHODS DOES NOT VERIFY RESULTS WHICH ASSUME INCORRECT PRESUPPOSITIONS

c) EVOLUTIONISTS' INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY VERIFIES FALSIFIED AGES

d) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF 'GROWN' CREATION WITH 'APPARENT AGE' ATTESTS TO ALL SUBSTANCES BEING PRESENT IN THE BEGINNING: INCLUDING RADIOACTIVE 'PARENT' AND 'CHILDREN' ELEMENTS

e) PLEOCHROIC HALOS SUPPORT RECENT CREATION & FLOOD

f) METEORITE RADIOACTIVITY REFUTES CONCEPT OF OLD UNIVERSE

8) METHODS OF AGE MEASUREMENT INDICATE A YOUNG EARTH, (cont.)

c)METORITIC DUST POINTS TO A YOUNG EARTH

d) TEKTITES, (METEORITIC GLASS), DISPROVE EVOLUTION

e) THE AMOUNTS OF HELIUM IN THE ATMOSPHERE CORRESPOND TO A YOUNG EARTH

1) HELIUM 4

2) HELIUM 3

f) 'LOW' SALT CONTENT IN THE SEA INDICATES A RECENT CREATION

g) THE SMALL AMOUNT OF JUVENILE, (ORIGINAL VOLCANIC), WATER INDICATES A YOUNG EARTH

h)THE THINNESS OF THE EARTH'S CRUST TESTIFIES TO A RECENT CREATION AND NULLIFIES THE CONCEPT OF AN OLD ONE!

i) THE AMOUNT OF PRESSURE IN UNDERGROUND OIL RESERVES TESTIFIES TO A YOUNG EARTH

j) CONCLUSION RE: METHODS OF TIME MEASUREMENT

C) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY & PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A RECENT CREATION OF LIFEFORMS

1) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY OF A RECENT CREATION OF LIFEFORMS

DETAILED INDEX OF THIS SECTION

2) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A RECENT CREATION OF LIFEFORMS

a) INTERDEPENDENCE OF LIFEFORMS POINTS TO A FULLY COMPLETED & RECENT CREATION

b) LIFEFORMS ARE DEVOLVING NOT EVOLVING

c) THE PREVIOUS EXISTENCE OF EXTINCT CREATURES IS BEST EXPLAINED BY A RECENT CREATION AND THE FLOOD

III) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY & PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A DESIGNED AND ORCHESTRATED CREATION

A) THE INCREDIBLY COMPLEX DESIGN OF THE UNIVERSE POINTS TO A SUPREME DESIGNER: THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

1) PHYSICAL LAWS & CONSTANTS TESTIFY TO DESIGNED CREATION

a) INTRODUCTION

b) THE 1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

c) THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

1) INTRODUCTION

2) 2ND LAW DOES APPLY TO OPEN SYSTEMS: THE REAL WORLD

3) EVOLUTION REQUIRES INCREASE IN ENERGY & INFORMATION WHICH CONTRADICTS WHAT IS OBSERVED: THE 2ND LAW

4) 2ND LAW APPLIES TO LIFEFORMS RULING OUT EVOLUTION

5) THE 2ND LAW APPLIES THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE TO THE EXCLUSION OF EVOLUTION

2) IF EVOLUTION WERE TRUE THEN WHERE DID THE FIRST MATTER COME FROM?

3) SINGING STARS PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF A CREATOR GOD

a) SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY

b) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

B) THE INCREDIBLY COMPLEX DESIGN OF THE EARTH POINTS TO A SUPREME DESIGNER: THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

1) GOD CREATED EARTH AS PARADISE BEFORE THE FALL & FLOOD

a) THE EARTH'S PROTECTIVE SUPERCOLD METALLIC FIBEROPTIC CRYSTALLINE ICE CANOPY

b) THE CONTROLLED NUCLEAR REACTION INSIDE THE EARTH

c) FORESTS REVERBERATED WITH MUSIC

2) GOD ORCHESTRATED THE FLOOD AS A RESULT OF MAN'S INCORRIGIBLE DEPRAVITY

C) THE INCREDIBLY COMPLEX DESIGN OF ALL LIFEFORMS POINTS TO A SUPREME DESIGNER: THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

1) INTRODUCTION

2) IMMEDIATE EXISTENCE OF COMPLEX LIFE FORMS AND THE ABSENCE OF INTERMEDIATE LIFEFORMS SPELL A DESIGNED & ORCHESTRATED CREATION

3) MAN IS UNIQUE & COULD NOT HAVE EVOLVED FROM SOMETHING LESS

a) ORIGINAL MAN WAS A SUPERIOR MAN - HE DID NOT EVOLVE

b) MAN HAS A UNIQUE SOUL - SIGNIFYING A SUPREME DESIGNER

c) CONCEPTUAL THOUGHT NOT AN EVOLUTIONARY POSSIBILITY, BUT DESIGNED BY SUPREMELY SUPERIOR MENTALITY

4) VARIATIONS IN LIFEFORMS: MICRO VARIATION NOT MACRO EVOLUTION - A DESIGN WITHIN EACH SPECIES - GOD'S DESIGN, NOT EVOLUTION

5) SIMILARITIES = COMMON DESIGN NOT COMMON ANCESTRY

6) 'PREHISTORIC' MAN DISCOVERIES SUPPORT A DESIGNED & ORCHESTRATED CREATION NOT EVOLUTION

a) INTRODUCTION

b) REAL DISCOVERIES SUPPORT A DESIGNED CREATION WHEN PROPERLY INVESTIGATED

1) HOMO SAPIEN DISCOVERIES: CRO MAGNON & MODERN MAN

2) NEANDERTHAL MAN

3) RHODESIAN MAN AND THE REST OF 'ARCHAIC' HOMO SAPIENS

4) PITHECANTHROPUS ERECTUS = HOMO ERECTUS = JAVA MAN

5) WADJAK MAN

6) HOMO HABILIS: COMPLETELY ANIMAL OR COMPLETELY MAN

a) 'NUTCRACKER MAN' - A PRIMATE

b) COMPLETELY HUMAN 'HOMO HABILIS' DISCOVERIES

c) CONCLUSION

7) AUSTRALOPITHECINES: EXTINCT PRIMATES

8) RAMAPITHECUS: COMPLETELY APE

c) FALSIFIED DISCOVERIES EXPOSE EVOLUTIONISTS AS DEVIOUS

1) THE PILTDOWN MAN HOAX

2) THE SPY MAN FABRICATION

3) THE 1926 JAVA MAN

4) NEBRASKA MAN

5) THE TAUNG FOSSIL

6) THE KANAPOI ELBOW FOSSIL

7) THE FALSIFIED SKULL SIZE ARGUMENT

8) SKULL MORPHOLOGY ARGUMENT

d) CONCLUSION

7) MICROBIOLOGY IS IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX AND DEMANDS AN INTELLIGENT CREATOR

a) INTRODUCTION

i) THE BLOOD COAGULATING SYSTEM IS IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX AND DEMANDS AN INTELLIGENT CREATOR

IV) PHYSICAL EVIDENCE REFUTES EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES

A) EVOLUTIONARY 'THEORIES' OF THE ORIGIN OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM REFUTED

1) INTRODUCTION

2) NEBULAR HYPOTHESIS

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE:

3) FISSION 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

4) CAPTURE 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

5) ACCRETION 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

6) PLANETARY COLLISION 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

7) STELLAR COLLISION 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

8) GAS CLOUD 'THEORY'

a) THE 'THEORY'

b) WHY THE 'THEORY' IS NOT TRUE

9) CHEMICAL EVOLUTION THEORY

10) EXPANDING UNIVERSE: BIG BANG THEORY

V) CONCLUSION: CREATIONISM VS. EVOLUTION

A) EVOLUTIONISTS' CLAIMS SUSPECT EVEN AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS

1) COSMIC EVOLUTION

2) EVOLUTION OF LIFE FROM NON-LIFE

3) EVOLUTION OF SPECIES

4) EVOLUTION OF HUMAN LIFE

5) THE FOSSIL EVIDENCE

6) EXTINCTION VERSUS SPECIATION

7) UNIFORMITARIANISM

8) SOCIAL HARMFULNESS OF EVOLUTION

9) SCIENTIFIC BIGOTRY

B) SUMMARY

1) BANKRUPTCY OF UNIFORMITARIANISM

2) TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE WORLDVIEWS: ONLY ONE IS RIGHT

a) INTRODUCTION

b) EVOLUTION

c) CREATIONISM