PROMISE KEEPERS -- another ecumenical bandwagon coming this way

Yet another false and deceitful method of advancing the cause of Satan has arisen in the United States. It is called Promise Keepers! It is an organisation formed in 1990 by University of Colorado football coach, Bill McCartney. Mr. McCartney is a Roman Catholic convert to charismaticism after visiting Boulder Vineyard Fellowship which is linked to the "Toronto Blessing" fellowship in Toronto, Canada. He has never publicly broken with Roman Catholicism. Indeed, in his autobiography, From Ashes to Glory, he calls himself "a born-again Catholic." That his "conversion" is not the spiritual experience that the Bible speaks of may be seen from another statement he makes in his book. "Making a profession of faith like I did may not be expected and may not even be important in the Catholic church." No truly born-again person would thus dismiss so lightly what the Lord Jesus declared to be an absolute essential. Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God, John 3:3. McCartney's "born-again" experience was something of a religious accessory, a non-essential element of spirituality.

At a press conference in Buffalo, New York, in May of this year, Bill McCartney said that the PK organisation had the approval of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Roman Catholic speakers are common at PK events and its Board of Directors includes a Roman Catholic member, Michael Timmis of Michigan. A Presbyterian minister, Rev. Dean Weaver of Knox Presbyterian Church in Kenmore, NY, said in the same press conference that "I believe that Promise Keepers is the vehicle God has created to bring down barriers in western New York." A special mass was said at the church of "Our Lady of the sacred Heart", to help Roman Catholic men prepare for the PK conference, by Monsignor James E. Wall, vicar of priests for the Catholic diocese.

From its beginnings in 1990, the organisation has enjoyed extensive support. Crowds of 50,000 men are not uncommon at its rallies. In 1996, 22 rallies across the USA averaged 50,000 at each of them. The gatherings are characterised by scenes reminiscent of charismatic meetings, for in essence that is what they are. Those who join the organisation promise to keep seven basic rules of conduct which, it is believed, are the substance of genuine Christian behaviour.


Among the contributors to a workbook: The seven promises of a Promise Keeper, are well known ecumenists such as Bill Bright and Luis Palau. Under promise number 6, there is a call to unity in which the old ecumenical lie, that all churches are part of the true church of Christ and ought to break down all the barriers that separate them, is propagated. At a Clergy Conference for Men, in Atlanta, Georgia, in February 1996, Bill McCartney said that denominational barriers had been removed and Protestant groups as well as Roman Catholics were welcome to participate, for that was one of the purposes of the PK organisation. The registration fee at that gathering alone brought in $3-$4 million. The yearly income is reported as being in the region of $110 million.

One prominent associate of the PK movement, Roman Catholic priest, Michael Scanlon, wrote an article in the June 1997 edition of New Covenant, a charismatic Roman Catholic publication, entitled: "Mary, Spouse of the Holy Spirit: What God has joined should remain joined in our hearts." Scanlon is head of the Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio. It has frequently been the location for PK conferences. In July 1995, an official PK Leadership Seminar for 600 men was held there and it was concluded by a mass led by priest Scanlon.

In the article, Scanlon blasphemously asserts that Mary became the spouse of the Holy Spirit when she was allegedly "immaculately conceived." The university, as well as sponsoring PK conferences, sponsors an annual "Defending the Faith" conference in which the blasphemies and lies of Popery are set forth as divine truth.


Already there has been agitation to introduce this latest swindle of the devil to the United Kingdom and to Ulster. Let it be given the reception it merits by those who love God's truth in sincerity -- that of utter rejection. Like all frauds, it thrives on ignorance. It behoves the servant of God to be diligent in his pulpit ministrations and expose and resist every innovation from the pit that seeks inroads in our land. The need today is, as ever, to earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ, Jude 1:3-4.




By Ernest Pickering

April 23, 1996 (Fundamental Baptist News Service, 1219 N. Harns Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277) - The following is from Promise Keepers and the Forgotten Promise by Ernest Pickering. This booklet is available from Baptist World Mission, P.O. Box 1463, Decatur, AL 35602:

"Promise Keepers is as serious an attack upon biblical separatism and fundamentalism as the [churches have] seen since the rise of Billy Graham and his ecumenical evangelism a generation ago. It is going to cause major problems for pastors who are trying to maintain a biblical position.

"This movement is PROMOTING A DISREGARD FOR THE BIBLICAL TEACHING ON ECCLESIASTICAL SEPARATION. This is a very difficult teaching to protect anyway, because the tide of public opinion and even evangelical opinion is running strongly against separatists. It is not fashionable to raise barriers and delineate theological truths sharply. When a major group like Promise Keepers urges the Christian public to drop their `biases' and `prejudices' and rally together with all who call themselves Christians, many within even fundamental churches are going to respond positively. Many think fundamentalists are too contentious anyway and will welcome an opportunity to break away from what they feel are overly-narrow parameters. In most of our separatist churches there are people who are members, and even, in some cases, leaders, but who do not really share the separatist convictions of the church. If the pastor does not promote Promise Keepers, such people are likely to promote division in the church.

"Fundamental churches that become active in the Promise Keepers movement WILL BE EXPOSING THEIR MEN TO TEACHINGS, PHILOSOPHIES, AND ACTIVITIES THAT ARE CONTRARY TO THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THEIR CHURCH. While some men could perhaps attend rallies without being negatively influenced away from their church's teachings, they will be relatively few in number. `Evil communications corrupt good manners' (1 Cor. 15:33), or, as someone has rendered it, `Bad company corrupts good character.' If men of a fundamental church associate on a regular basis in worship with Roman Catholics and charismatics, their spiritual character is going to be corrupted, their discernment will be impaired, and their stand for the faith will be weakened. This in turn will cause the entire church to shift its position, since men are the leaders of the church. It will be gradual, but it will happen.

"As men participate in Promise Keepers, THEY WILL BE ATTRACTED TO LEADERS WHO ARE NOT SOUND IN THEIR THEOLOGY AND PRACTICE. The speakers represent a wide spectrum of theological teaching which would be contrary to the teaching of most fundamental churches. It is already difficult for pastors of sound churches to protect their sheep from attractive and articulate persons like this. They are featured in many public settings, author best-selling books, and appear on Christian radio and television. A pastor does not need to give them further exposure to his people through Promise Keepers.

"Participating in the programs of Promise Keepers OPENS THE DOOR FOR FURTHER AND WIDER COMPROMISES. Once you begin to ignore or at least minimize the importance of sound doctrine in favor of certain perceived benefits, it is easier to continue doing this. Convictions begin to erode, and justification is made for all manner of unholy alliances.

"To involve the men of a fundamental church with a group including many non-fundamentalists encourages a pragmatic and `feeling-oriented' basis of judgment rather than a scriptural one. We are living in a society that has largely replaced the objective with the subjective. The important point for many is `How do I feel about this?' If one `feels good,' or `receives a blessing,' then the activity must be acceptable. To sing rousing songs with 30,000 men in a stadium is exhilarating to many. They view it as an uplifting spiritual experience without stopping to consider the theological ramifications of it. This is to put the judgments of men above the judgments of God. Our prayer and aim ought to be that of the psalmist: `Make me to go in the path of thy commandments, for therein do I delight' (Ps. 119:35). Our question should not be whether or not we are having a `meaningful experience,' but whether we are walking in the commandments of the Lord. Are the premises of Promise Keepers scriptural? This is the key question.

"To worship and cooperate with Roman Catholics and others who are in doctrinal error PROMOTES THE IDEA THAT CORRECT DOCTRINE IS LESS IMPORTANT THAN FELLOWSHIP. This is a very popular concept today in Christendom. One is reminded of the slogan of an organization that was one of the forerunners of the World Council of Churches: `Doctrine divides, but service unites.' Many professed evangelicals today follow that philosophy, though they may not articulate it in that way. But it is not God's emphasis. The early [churches] continued `in the apostle's doctrine and fellowship...' (Acts 2:42). Doctrine is more important than fellowship and is listed first. Fellowship must be built on doctrine.

"There is at least one more potential result from involvement with Promise Keepers that might be harmful. IT REMOVES THE CENTER OF BIBLICAL INSTRUCTION, AT LEAST IN SOME MATTERS, AWAY FROM THE LOCAL CHURCH. Where are men supposed to be receiving their spiritual instruction? The answer is clear from Scripture--from their pastor within the context of their own church. This is not to say that one cannot be blessed and helped occasionally through the ministry of someone outside the church. However, the New Testament emphasizes the fact that the God-appointed pastor is to be the chief spiritual tutor.

"`And he gave some ... pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ' (Eph. 4:11,12). The leaders of the Promise Keepers are not the pastors of the men to whom they minister. Whose responsibility is it to teach men about how to be fathers, husbands, and spiritual leaders? It is the responsibility of the pastor. ...

"People will travel hundreds of miles and pay lots of money to sit and watch a noted leader put diagrams on a huge overhead screen, and with much flourish and charisma tell them the very same things their pastor has been telling them for many years. They will return to their homes, however, and tell their friends, `I never heard such teaching! I learned so much!' The fact of the matter is, they heard little that their pastor had not already told them many times. But to hear it in a different, more `exotic' setting from someone who is supposed to be a noted `expert,' somehow seemed to give to it an authority heretofore unknown.

"Special problems can arise, however, when outside teachers, not part of the local church, give instruction which is contrary to that given by the pastor. Bill McCartney, as an example, says it is perfectly all right to worship with Roman Catholics, yet a man's pastor says it is not. A conflict is immediately engaged, and to whom will the church member be loyal?

"What should Bible-believing pastors and local churches do about the problems created by Promise Keepers?


We need not do it in a nasty spirit, but we need to do it. Many good men are taken in by such movements as this, simply because they are not aware of the problems. It is the pastor's task to 'feed the church' as an overseer appointed by God (Acts 20:28). This involves protecting the sheep from harmful influences.


There will be great pressure on some pastors to do just this, but the pastor must be resolute.


Many churches may have inadequate ministry to men and may need to recognize that weakness if it is present and make plans to correct it.


The pastor should examine his own preaching and teaching ministry. Is he preaching the `whole counsel of God' which would include truth calculated to make the men of his church spiritually stronger? Is he exposing his men to biblical truth that will make them better husbands, fathers, and church leaders? Pastors are human and can sometimes fall into patterns of preaching that may be lacking in certain truths.


The men of the church, particularly the leaders, should not allow a movement like this to take the church off course from its historic and biblical position. Good laymen within our churches should stand with the pastor and help other men see the dangers of becoming involved with Promise Keepers.

David Cloud 1219 N. Harns Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277

[Distributed by Way of Life Literature's Fundamental Baptist News Service. This is a free listing. If you desire to receive this type of material on a regular basis, e-mail us, tell us who you are and where you are located and the name of your church, and request to be placed on the list. Please also include your postal address. Some of these articles are from the "Digging in the Walls" section of O Timothy magazine. David W. Cloud, Editor. O Timothy is a magazine-sized monthly in its 12th year of publication. Subscription is $20/yr. Way of Life Literature, 1219 N. Harns Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277. The Editor's e-mail address is The Way of Life web site is The Fundamental Baptist News Service web site is]