THE ORIGINAL BIBLE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I) THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT

A) INTRODUCTION: THE SEARCH FOR THE ORIGINAL TEXT

B) MAJORITY TEXT = TEXTUS RECEPTUS

C) WESTCORT-HORT TEXT

D) CONCLUSION: ALL OF THE DOCTRINES OF THE ORIGINAL BIBLE HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE AGE:

II) WAS THE BIBLE ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN ARAMAIC?

A) THE LACK OF AVAILABILITY OF THE ARAMAIC LANGUAGE TO THE WORLD AND OF SUFFICIENT NUMBERS OF ARAMAIC MANUSCRIPTS THROUGHOUT THE AGES INDICATE THAT GOD DID NOT INTEND FOR THE ARAMAIC LANGUAGE TO BE USED TO RELAY HIS WORD TO THE WORLD AS AN ORIGINAL TEXT

1) INTRODUCTION:

2) CLAIMS THAT NEITHER GREEK NOR ARAMAIC TEXTS HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE CENTURIES ARE REFUTED

a) INTRODUCTION

b) THE BEST LANGUAGE TO CONVEY GOD'S WORD TO THE WORLD AT THE TIME IT WAS WRITTEN WAS GREEK

c) THE RESULT OF MANKIND TURNING ITS BACK ON GOD AND HIS WORD OVER THE CENTURIES: THE WORD IS CAST OUT OF MAN'S IMMEDIATE REACH NEVERTHELESS IT WAS STILL AVAILABLE TO THOSE THAT SOUGHT HIS WORDS

i) [Isa 28:11]:

3) ARAMAIC MANUSCRIPTS ARE TRANSLATIONS FROM THE GREEK, THEY ARE NOT ORIGINAL; AND THEY ARE WRITTEN IN A VARIANT DIALECT OF THE LANGUAGE THAT JESUS SPOKE NOT THE ACTUAL DIALECT

a) INTRODUCTION

b) OLD TESTAMENT

c) NEW TESTAMENT

i) THE LANGUAGE OF THE SYRIAC BIBLE IS A VARIANT OF THE LANGUAGE OF OUR LORD'S AND NOT THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE

B) SINCE ONLY THE 66 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE AND ONLY IN GREEK AND HEBREW HAVE PROVIDED AN INERRANT COMMUNICATION OF GOD'S WORD THROUGHOUT THE AGES OR FOR ANY AGE, THEN IT IS SELF EVIDENT THAT THIS IS WHAT GOD HAS INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE TO THE WORLD AS HIS REVEALED WORD

1) INTRODUCTION

2) FALSE CLAIM THAT SINCE THE GREEK BIBLE CONTAINS ELEMENTS OF ARAMAIC THINKING AND BACKGROUND THAT IT MUST HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN ARAMAIC

3) CLAIMS THAT CERTAIN PASSAGES DO MAKE SENSE IN THE GREEK BUT AN ALTERNATIVE RENDERING IN ARAMAIC DOES MAKE SENSE ARE REFUTED

a) [Acts 11:27-30]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

b) [Mt 26:6, cp. Mk 14:3]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

c) [Mt 19:12]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

[Mt 19:10]:

[1 Cor 7:1-10]:

d) [Acts 8:27]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

e) [Mt 19:24-26]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

f) [Mt 6:22-23]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

g) [Rev 19:17]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

h) CONCLUSION

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

THE GREEK BIBLE AND A GOOD ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF IT DO NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM IN THE COMMUNICATION OF THE WORDS OF GOD'S WORD

THE BETTER FEATURES OFFERED BY THE ARAMAIC CAMP TO ENHANCE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE BIBLE ARE EITHER ALREADY AVAILABLE OR NOT GOOD FEATURES AT ALL

4) CLAIMS THAT THE GREEK TEXT HAS SERIOUS GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IS REFUTED

a) INTRODUCTION

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

b) POINT #1 = Rev 1:4

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

c) POINT #2 = Rev 1:15

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

d) POINT #3 = Rev 11:3

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

e) POINT #4 = Rev 14:14

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

f) POINT #5 = Rev 14:19

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

g) POINT #6 = Rev 17:4

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

h) POINT #7 = Rev 19:20

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

i) POINT # 8 = Rev 20:2

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

j) POINT # 9 =Rev 21:9

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

k) POINT # 10 = Rev 22:5

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

5) FINALLY, MISTAKES IN THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT ARE CLAIMED IN ADDITION TO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS

a) INTRODUCTION

b) [Mt 23:35]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

c) [Mt 27:9-10]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

[Mt 27:1-10]:

[Zech 11:4-13]:

[Jer 19:1-13]:

[Gal 4:22-31]:

d) [Lk 3:23, 36]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEKCAMP]:

e) [Mt 1:1-17]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

6) CLAIMS THAT VARIANCES IN GREEK MANUSCRIPTS PROVE THAT THE GREEK BIBLE IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY ARE REFUTED

a) INTRODUCTION

i) THE POSSIBILITY THAT ONE OF THE VARIANTS IS CORRECT, THE OTHER A COPYING ERROR

ii) THE POSSIBILITY THAT NONE OF THE VARIANTS WAS THE ORIGINAL THEREFORE NOT PROVING ANYTHING

iii) THE POSSIBILITY THAT ANY OF THE VARIANTS DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE DOCTRINES OF SCRIPTURE

b) [Jn 1:18]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

[Heb 11:17]:

c) [1 Pet 3:15]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

d) [Acts 20:28]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

e) [Heb 2:9]:

i) ARAMAIC CAMP

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

f) [Col 1:15-16]:

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

g) CONCLUSION

i) [ARAMAIC CAMP]:

ii) [GREEK CAMP]:

III) CONCLUSION: THE LANGUAGE OF THE GOSPEL - THE NEW TESTAMENT BIBLE WAS GREEK

A) INTRODUCTION

B) WHAT LANGUAGE DID JESUS SPEAK?

C) THE PROCESS USED FOR WRITING THE GOSPELS - EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT THE GOSPELS INCL MATTHEW AND MARK WERE ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN KOINE GREEK