JOHN CHAPTER 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OBSERVATION STAGE
The purpose
of the observation stage is to maintain focus on the text at hand in
accordance with the framework in which it was written: a framework
which is defined by the normative rules of language, context and logic.
Rules which do not impose undue, unintended meanings to the text ,
and which largely limit the observer to the content offered by the
Gospel of John. In order for any passage from elsewhere to be
considered, it must have a relationship with the context at hand, such
as a Scriptural quotation or a specific cross reference in the passage
at hand by the author. This will serve to avoid going on unnecessary
tangents elsewhere; and more importantly, it will provide the framework
for a proper and objective comparison with passages located elsewhere
in Scripture.
Remember that
something elsewhere may be true, but in the text at hand it may not be
in view.
I) [Jn 6:1-6]:
A) THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE FROM CHAPTER
FIVE CONTINUES INTO CHAPTER SIX: AFTER A POTENTIALLY DEADLY
CONFRONTATION WITH JEWISH AUTHORITIES FOR CLAIMING EQUALITY WITH GOD
AND ALLEGEDLY VIOLATING THE SABBATH; JESUS, EVIDENTLY IN CONTROL OF HIS
DESTINY, WENT AWAY UNHARMED ACROSS THE SEA OF GALILEE
*** EXCERPT
FROM CHAPTER 5 ***
..........OR SKIP TO NEXT
SECTION
JESUS SAID TO THE JEWS WHO WERE SEEKING
TO KILL HIM THAT IF HE BORE WITNESS OF HIMSELF, (ALTHOUGH ACCURATE), IT
WOULD NOT BE TRUE IN THE SENSE OF IT BEING VALID TESTIMONY.
HE THEN SAID THAT ANOTHER BORE WITNESS OF HIM WHOSE
WITNESS HE HAD KNOWN WAS TRUE: JOHN THE BAPTIST, TO WHOM THE JEWS WERE
SENT TO INVESTIGATE.
BUT JESUS SAID HE RECEIVED TESTIMONY FROM NO MAN, FOR
ONLY HIS FATHER'S TESTIMONY WILL DO. HE SAID THESE THINGS BECAUSE THERE
WAS GREATER TESTIMONY FROM THE FATHER WHICH THE JEWS MIGHT CHOOSE TO
BELIEVE AND BE SAVED; FOR JOHN WAS THE BURNING AND SHINING LAMP OF
TRUTH; BUT THE JEWS WERE ONLY WILLING FOR A WHILE TO REJOICE IN HIS
LIGHT UNTIL THEY FOUND OUT THAT HE WAS NOT THE CHRIST, OR THE PROPHET
WHO WAS TO COME. SO THE JEWS REJECTED JESUS' AND JOHN'S TESTIMONY.
HENCE JESUS DECLARED THAT HE HAD GREATER TESTIMONY THAN
JOHN'S - THE FATHER'S:
THE WORKS THAT HE DID WHICH THE FATHER HAD GIVEN HIM TO
FINISH BORE WITNESS OF WHO HE WAS - THAT THE FATHER HAD SENT HIM;
AND JESUS
SAID THAT THE FATHER WHO SENT HIM TESTIFIED OF HIM.
SINCE THE
JEWS NEITHER BELIEVED THAT THE WORKS HE PERFORMED WERE GIVEN TO HIM BY
THE FATHER TO DO, NOR BELIEVED THAT HE WAS THE ONE WHOM GOD SENT SO
THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE ETERNAL LIFE; JESUS CONCLUDED THAT THE JEWS HAD
NEITHER HEARD THE FATHER'S VOICE NOR SEEN HIS FORM, NOR HAD THEY HIS
WORD ABIDING IN THEM IN THE SENSE OF IT OPERATING IN THEIR LIVES.
HE SAID
THAT THEY SEARCHED THE SCRIPTURES THINKING THAT IT WOULD BRING THEM
ETERNAL LIFE - SCRIPTURES WHICH TESTIFIED ABOUT JESUS WHOM THEY WERE
UNWILLING TO COME TO SO THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE ETERNAL LIFE.
JESUS SAID
THAT HE WAS NOT MOTIVATED TO SEEK GLORY FROM MAN BECAUSE HE KNEW THAT
THE CHARACTER OF MAN WAS NOT TRUSTWORTHY. HE DECLARED THAT THE JEWISH
AUTHORITIES DID NOT HAVE THE LOVE OF GOD IN THEM. HE RECEIVED GLORY
FROM GOD AND HE CAME IN HIS FATHER'S NAME AND YET THEY DID NOT RECEIVE
HIM. BUT IF ANOTHER CAME IN HIS OWN NAME, THE JEWS WOULD RECEIVE HIM.
HE DECLARED IN A RHETORICAL QUESTION, 'HOW CAN YOU BELIEVE WHEN YOU
RECEIVE GLORY FROM ONE ANOTHER AND DO NOT SEEK THE GLORY THAT IS FROM
THE ONE AND ONLY GOD?'
IN
CONCLUSION, JESUS SAID FOR THEM NOT TO THINK THAT HE WOULD ACCUSE THEM
BEFORE THE FATHER, FOR THE ONE WHO ACCUSES THEM IS MOSES, IN WHOM THEY
HAVE SET THEIR HOPE OF ETERNAL LIFE. IF THEY HAD BELIEVED IN MOSES,
THEY WOULD HAVE BELIEVED IN JESUS, BECAUSE MOSES WROTE CONCERNING
JESUS. AND SINCE THEY DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE WRITINGS OF MOSES, HOW
WOULD THEY BELIEVE IN JESUS' WORDS? =
1) [Compare Jn 3:31-32]:
2) [Compare Jn 5:19 NKJV]:
3) [Compare Jn 3:1 YLT]:
4) [Compare Jn 2:23-25]:
[]:
*** END
OF EXCERPT FROM CHAPTER 5 ***
B) A GREAT CROWD WAS FOLLOWING JESUS
BECAUSE OF SEEING THE MIRACLES HE WAS PERFORMING ON THE SICK. WHEN
JESUS WENT UP TO A MOUNTAINSIDE - NEAR THE TIME OF THE PASSOVER - AND
AS HE WAS SITTING WITH THE DISCIPLES, HE LIFTED UP HIS EYES AND HAVING
SEEN A GREAT CROWD COMING, ASKED PHILIP "WHERE SHALL WE BUY BREAD FOR
THESE PEOPLE TO EAT?" WHICH AUTHOR JOHN INTERJECTS THAT HE (JESUS)
ASKED THIS TO TEST PHILIP (AND INDIRECTLY ALL THE DISCIPLES); FOR JESUS
HAD KNOWN WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO. THIS IMPLIES THAT JESUS KNEW THAT
THE PEOPLE WERE HUNGRY AND WITHOUT FOOD AND INTENDED TO FEED THEM
MIRACULOUSLY
1) [Compare Jn 6:2 Greek]:
II) [Jn 6:7-13]:
A) PHILIP'S ANSWER TO JESUS' QUESTION,
'WHERE SHOULD WE BUY LOAVES THAT THESE PEOPLE MAY EAT' IMPLIED THAT
THEY WERE FAR SHORT OF THE MONEY NEEDED. ANDREW, BROTHER OF SIMON
PETER, INDICATED THAT THERE WAS AN UTTERLY INSUFFICIENT SUPPLY OF FOOD
- HE ONLY FOUND ONE LITTLE BOY WHO HAD FIVE BARLEY LOAVES AND TWO SMALL
FISH. JESUS HAD THE CROWD OF MORE THAN FIVE THOUSAND SIT DOWN; THEN HE
HAD THE LOAVES AND FISHES DISTRIBUTED TO THEM IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT
RESULTED IN EVERYONE HAVING AS MUCH TO EAT AS THEY WISHED, IMPLYING A
MIRACLE. WHEREUPON HE HAD THE LEFTOVER FRAGMENTS OF BREAD GATHERED INTO
TWELVE HAND-BASKETS SO THAT NOTHING WOULD BE LOST
III) [Jn 6:14-21]:
A) THE CROWD THAT WAS FOLLOWING JESUS,
HAVING SEEN YET ANOTHER OF THE MIRACULOUS SIGNS THAT JESUS DID WHEN HE
MIRACULOUSLY FED THEM BY MULTIPLYING 5 LOAVES AND 2 FISH, WERE
DECLARING, "THIS IS TRULY THE PROPHET, THE [ONE WHO IS] THE COMING
[ONE] [INTO] THE WORLD"
**** EXCERPT FROM JOHN CHAPTER ONE RE: THE PROPHET WHO IS TO COME
***
OR SKIP
TO NEXT SECTION
THE JEWISH INTERROGATORS PERSISTED WITH
JOHN THE BAPTIST. THEY ASKED, "ARE YOU THE PROPHET," THEIR THIRD CHOICE
OF WHOM THEY THOUGHT JOHN THE BAPTIST MIGHT BE. THEY WERE REFERRING TO
SCRIPTURE TO THE ONE WHOM MOSES FORETOLD WOULD BE A PROPHET LIKE
HIMSELF - THE KEY PROPHET OF ISRAEL - WHO WOULD LEAD THEM IN A FINAL
EXODUS FROM THEIR ENEMIES AND FROM SIN INTO THE PROMISED ETERNAL
KINGDOM OF GOD
[Compare Dt 18:15-19]:
**** END OF EXCERPT FROM JOHN CHAPTER ONE RE: THE PROPHET WHO IS
TO COME ***
B) THE CROWD DECLARES JESUS
TO BE THE PROPHET TO COME. JESUS HAVING KNOWN THE MOMENT THEY WOULD TRY
TO FORCE HIM TO BE KING WITHDREW TO THE MOUNTAIN BY HIMSELF. THAT
EVENING THE DISCIPLES DISEMBARKED FOR CAPERNAUM WITHOUT FINDING JESUS.
ABOUT 3 OR 3 1/2 MILES OUT, IN ROUGH SEAS, THEY WERE FRIGHTENED BY
JESUS APPROACHING THEM, WALKING ON THE SEA. WHEN JESUS SAID, "I AM, BE
NOT AFRAID," THEY RECEIVED HIM INTO THE SHIP AND AT THAT INSTANT THEY
MIRACULOUSLY WERE AT THEIR DESTINATION NEAR CAPURNAUM - MILES FROM
WHERE JESUS ENTERED THE SHIP
IV) [Jn 6:22-29]:
A)
ON THE NEXT DAY, THOSE OF THE CROWD WHO STAYED ON THE SEASIDE WHERE
JESUS FED THEM, SAW THAT NO VESSEL WAS THERE EXCEPT THE ONE THAT THE
DISCIPLES HAD DEPARTED IN, WITHOUT JESUS, THE NIGHT BEFORE; AND KNOWING
THAT JESUS WAS NOT IN THE REGION, THEY TOOK VESSELS WHICH HAD ARRIVED
FROM TIBERIAS TO CAPERNAUM IN SEARCH OF JESUS
1) [Jn 6:22a YLT]:
2) [Jn 6:22 Greek]:
3) [Jn 6:22b YLT]:
4) [Jn 6:22b Greek]:
5) [Jn 6:22c YLT]:
6) [Jn 6:22c Greek]:
B)
JESUS TOLD THOSE THAT FOLLOWED HIM THAT THEY SOUGHT HIM, NOT BECAUSE
THEY SAW MIRACULOUS SIGNS, WHICH SHOULD HAVE CONVINCED THEM THAT HE WAS
THE SON OF MAN / THE MESSIAH / SAVIOR WHO WAS TO COME INTO THE WORLD TO
OFFER ETERNAL LIFE - THE ONE UPON WHOM THE FATHER GAVE HIS SEAL OF
APPROVAL; BUT THEY PURSUED HIM BECAUSE THEIR STOMACHS WERE FILLED - A
SHALLOW MOTIVE TO SATISFY TEMPORAL NEEDS WHICH FILLING HAS TO BE
REPEATED. HENCE THEY NEGLECTED THE ONE TIME FULFILLMENT OF THEIR NEED
FOR ETERNAL LIFE. RECALL THEIR INTENTION TO FORCE JESUS TO BE KING TO
RELIEVE THEMSELVES OF THE TEMPORAL OPPRESSION OF ROME
C) WHEN JESUS TOLD
THE REMAINING CROWD THAT THEY WERE TO WORK NOT FOR FOOD THAT PERISHES,
BUT FOR FOOD THAT ENDURES TO ETERNAL LIFE; HE WAS COMPARING THE
TEMPORAL NATURE OF EATING PHYSICAL FOOD WHICH ONLY SATISFIES FOR A
SHORT WHILE AND WHICH CONSUMPTION HAS TO BE REPEATED, TO THE ONE TIME
MOMENT OF "WORKING" FOR THE FOOD THAT, ONCE RECEIVED, ENDURES TO
ETERNAL LIFE - RECEPTION OF WHICH DOES NOT NEED TO BE REPEATED
D) JESUS' DECLARATION THAT "THE SON
OF MAN WILL GIVE TO YOU FOOD THAT IS THE ENDURING KIND TO LIFE ETERNAL"
PORTRAYS THE SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE SON OF MAN - THE
REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL HUMANITY. JESUS REFERRED TO "THE SON OF
MAN" IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT POINTED TO HIMSELF. BY THIS HE CORROBORATED
HIS MISSION TO MAKE PROVISION FOR ETERNAL LIFE FOR THE WHOLE WORLD AS A
FREE GIFT. HIS DECLARATION IMPLIED THAT HE HAD THE AUTHORITY AND POWER
TO GIVE ETERNAL LIFE, WHICH IN TURN IMPLIED THAT HE HIMSELF WAS
ETERNAL, INDICATING DIETY. FINALLY, JESUS PROCLAIMED THAT HE, THE SON
OF MAN, HAD THE SEAL - THE ABSOLUTE APPROVAL OF GOD THE FATHER - FOR
ALL THAT HE WAS AND DID
E) AFTER JESUS TOLD THE REMAINING CROWD TO
WORK NOT FOR TEMPORAL THINGS BUT FOR ETERNAL LIFE WHICH HE, THE SON OF
MAN, WILL "GIVE THEM;" THE CROWD ASKED JESUS, "WHAT SHALL WE DO, THAT
WE MAY WORK THE WORKS OF GOD?" THEIR FOCUS WAS ON A LIST OF THINGS THEY
HAD TO DO TO RECEIVE ETERNAL LIFE - THEY MISSED WHAT JESUS SAID ABOUT
GIVING THEM ETERNAL LIFE AS A FREE GIFT
F) JESUS TOLD THE REMAINING CROWD THAT THE
WORK OF GOD TO RECEIVE THE FOOD WHICH ENDURES TO ETERNAL LIFE IS TO
BELIEVE IN THE ONE WHOM GOD HAS SENT - A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN JESUS
CHRIST, THE SON OF MAN, ALONE TO GIVE ONE ETERNAL LIFE AS A FREE GIFT.
SINCE THE VERB TO BELIEVE - A MENTAL ASSENT TO THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS
CONVEYED - IS NOT A PROACTIVE ACTION HENCE IT IS NOT MERITORIOUS; AND
SINCE A WORK IS SOMETHING ONE DOES DO PROACTIVELY TO MERIT A RESULT;
THEN THE ACT OF BELIEVING IN JESUS CHRIST TO PROVIDE ETERNAL LIFE,
WHICH CANNOT BE MERITORIOUS, CANNOT BE A LITERAL WORK. SO JN 6:27-29
NEITHER PORTRAYS BELIEVING AS MERITORIOUS NOR PARTICIPATORY TOWARD THE
RECEPTION OF ETERNAL LIFE. THE SECOND "WORK" IN JN 6:27-29 IS A FIGURE
OF SPEECH - A CATACHRESIS, I.E., THAT WHICH CONTRASTS SOMETHING
RADICALLY OPPOSITE TO ITS LITERAL MEANING AS A PLAY ON WORDS. IT
PICTURES THE CONTRAST OF THE LITERAL WORK ONE MUST DO TO RECEIVE
PHYSICAL FOOD - FOOD WHICH SPOILS AND WHICH WORK HAS TO BE REPEATED
OVER AND OVER TO SUSTAIN PHYSICAL LIFE WITH THE SECOND "WORK" FOR THE
FOOD THAT ENDURES TO ETERNAL LIFE VIA A MOMENT OF BELIEVING IN JESUS
CHRIST WHICH NEEDS NO REPETITION AND IS NO WORK AT ALL FOR THE
BELIEVER. ON THE OTHER HAND, IT IS GOD THROUGH HIS SON, JESUS CHRIST,
WHO HAS DONE ALL THE WORK.
G) JN 6:27 CONVEYED TWO
KINDS OF FOOD WHICH BY DEFINITION WERE RECEIVED INTERNALLY BY AN
INDIVIDUAL. THE SECOND KIND OF FOOD WAS STIPULATED TO BE GIVEN AS A
FREE GIFT BY THE SON OF MAN IN A MOMENT OF TIME WHICH JESUS STIPULATED
FIGURATIVELY AS "WORK." HE ALSO SAID THAT, UNLIKE PHYSICAL FOOD, THE
SECOND KIND OF FOOD DID NOT PERISH, HENCE RECEPTION OF IT NEVER HAD TO
BE REPEATED; YET IT ENDURED WITHIN ONE TO ETERNAL LIFE. THE SECOND KIND
OF FOOD WAS NOT A PHYSICAL FOOD WHICH HAD TO BE REPEATEDLY CONSUMED. IT
WAS AN ETERNAL, SPIRITUAL FOOD. IN JN 6:29, JESUS SAID THAT THE "WORK"
BY WHICH ONE INTERNALLY RECEIVED THE FOOD THAT ENDURED TO ETERNAL LIFE
WAS DEFINED AS A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN THE SON OF MAN ALONE - THE
ONE GOD HAS SENT - JESUS HIMSELF. THE FOOD WHICH ENDURED TO ETERNAL
LIFE WHEN RECEIVED WITHIN ONE WAS THE PERMANENT SPIRITUAL INDWELLING OF
JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF MAN, WHO ENDURED IN ONE FOREVER UNTO ETERNAL
LIFE AS A ONCE FOR ALL TIME RECEPTION AT THE MOMENT ONE BELIEVED IN
HIM. DOING OTHER THINGS AND FURTHER MOMENTS OF BELIEVING WERE NOT
STIPULATED, NEVERTHELESS ETERNAL LIFE WAS FOREVER RECEIVED
H) THE PHRASE RENDERED,
"THAT YOU SHOULD BELIEVE" IN JN 6:29 NKJV STIPULATES THE SOLE CONDITION
REQUIRED OF MAN TO SECURE ETERNAL LIFE: A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN
CHRIST ALONE. THIS RULES OUT CONTINUOUS FAITH, WATER BAPTISM,
CONFESSION, FAITHFUL WORKS - ANY SUBSEQUENT ACTION. ONCE ONE EXPRESSES
A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN CHRIST ALONE, ETERNAL LIFE IS INSTANTLY
RECEIVED FOREVER BECAUSE IT ITESLF IS ETERNALLY CONTINUOUS AND
UNINTERRUPTIBLE BY DEFINITION AND NATURE. THERE IS NEITHER TIME AFTER
THAT MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE, NOR REQUIREMENT BY GOD TO DO ANYTHING ELSE
BEFORE ETERNAL LIFE IS RECEIVED AND FOREVER SECURED BY GOD
I) CONTINUAL FAITH OR FAITHFULNESS,
ALTHOUGH COMMENDABLE, IS NOT IN VIEW AS A REQUIREMENT TO
RECEIVE ETERNAL LIFE AS SOME MAINTAIN THE PRESENT TENSE "BELIEVE" IN JN
6:29 MUST CONVEY. NEW TESTAMENT GREEK REQUIRES SPECIAL CONTEXT AND / OR
ADDITIONAL QUALIFYING WORDS TO MAKE PRESENT TENSE PORTRAY AN ENDURING
OR CONTINUOUS ACTION. NONE ARE PRESENT HERE. FURTHERMORE A CONTINUOUS
STATE OF BELIEVING / FAITHFULNESS IS NOT POSSIBLE WITH FLAWED MAN AND
JN 6:27 RULES IT OUT. FINALLY, ETERNAL LIFE COULD NOT BE OFFERED ON THE
BASIS OF CONTINUAL FAITH OR FAITHFULNESS BECAUSE IF ONE COULD LOSE
ETERNAL LIFE DUE TO A LAPSE OF FAITH OR AN ACT OF UNFAITHFULNESS, THEN
IT COULD NOT BE ETERNAL. ON THE OTHER HAND, WHAT IS ENDURING IS THE
FOOD WHICH PROVIDES ETERNAL LIFE WHICH ONE RECEIVES FROM GOD AT THE
MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN JESUS CHRIST ALONE - THE PERMANENT SPIRITUAL
INDWELLING OF JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF.
J) NO OTHER PASSAGE NEEDS TO BE
CONSIDERED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE MORE REQUIREMENTS OR CORRECTIONS OF WHAT
JOHN 6:29 STIPULATES AS A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN CHRIST ALONE UNTO
ETERNAL LIFE FOREVER.
K) SAVING FAITH DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY
DEMONSTRATION OF THAT FAITH IN ONES LIFE IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE TRUE AND
EFFECTIVE IN THE RECEPTION OF ETERNAL LIFE. ASSURANCE OF HAVING ETERNAL
LIFE COMES FROM RECALLING IN WHOM ONE BELIEVED IN TO RECEIVE IT: JESUS
CHRIST
V) [Jn 6:30-36]:
A) AFTER OBSERVING JESUS' MIRACULOUS SIGNS,
HEARING HIS TESTIMONY, AND CONCLUDING THAT HE WAS THE PROPHET TO COME,
THE CROWD STILL WANTED PROOF IN ORDER TO BELIEVE IN HIM. THEY BARGAINED
WITH HIM TO PRODUCE A GREATER MIRACLE THAN THE MANNA IN THE DESERT IN
ORDER TO BELIEVE IN HIM UNTO ETERNAL LIFE. JESUS INDICATED THAT THE
MANNA BREAD WAS GIVEN BY GOD THROUGH MOSES WHICH WAS PERISHABLE AND
ONLY SUSTAINED THE PHYSICAL LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ISRAELITES; BUT SO
MUCH THE MORE, JESUS WAS THE TRUE BREAD OF GOD FROM HEAVEN WHO HAD COME
DOWN TO GIVE ETERNAL LIFE TO ALL WHO BELIEVED - A FAR GREATER MIRACLE
WHOM THEY HAD SEEN BUT IN WHOM THEY DID NOT BELIEVE.
B) NO MAN HAD AS YET BEEN IN HEAVEN WHEN
JESUS REFERRED TO HIMSELF AS THE TRUE BREAD OF GOD FROM HEAVEN - THE
BREAD OF ETERNAL LIFE. THIS IS A REFERENCE TO HIS ETERNAL AND HEAVENLY
EXISTENCE AS THE SON OF GOD - AS DIETY. THIS IS CORROBORATED BY HIS
CALLING GOD HIS FATHER, IMPLYING AN INTIMATE AND ETERNAL RELATIONSHIP
WITH GOD AS THE SON OF GOD
******* EXCERPT
FROM JOHN CHAPTER 3 ********
AT THE TIME OF JESUS' CONVERSATION WITH
NICODEMUS, NO ONE HAD ASCENDED TO HEAVEN BUT THE SON OF MAN, JESUS
HIMSELF, WHO CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN, WHO YET WAS IN HEAVEN - A REFERENCE
TO HIS ETERNAL OMNIPRESENCE IN HEAVEN AND ON EARTH - AN ATTRIBUTE OF
GOD ALONE
[Compare Jn 1:48-51]:
***** END
OF EXCERPT FROM JOHN CHAPTER 3 *****
VI) [Jn 6:37-40]:
A) GOD THE FATHER GAVE TO HIS SON, JESUS
CHRIST, AS A GIFT ALL INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL EVER CHOOSE TO COME TO JESUS
IN THE SENSE OF BELIEVING IN HIM FOR ETERNAL LIFE. AND ALL WHO COME BY
FAITH TO HIM, HE WILL NEVER CAST OUT IN THE SENSE OF NEVER DENYING THEM
ETERNAL LIFE
B) JESUS ONCE MORE DECLARED TO THE JEWS
THAT HE HAD COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN NOT TO DO HIS OWN WILL BUT TO DO THE
WILL OF HIS FATHER WHO SENT HIM: TO SEE TO IT THAT ALL THAT THE FATHER
HAD GIVEN TO HIM - ALL WHO WILL "SEE" HIM IN THE SENSE OF BEING
PRESENTED WITH THE TRUTH ABOUT HIM - WHO CHOOSE TO EXPRESS A MOMENT OF
FAITH ALONE IN HIM ALONE UNTO ETERNAL LIFE, HE WILL NOT LOSE BUT RAISE
THEM ALL UPON THE LAST DAY TO EVERLASTING LIFE
VII) [Jn 6:41-51]:
A) THE JEWS WERE GRUMBLING BECAUSE JESUS
DECLARED, 'I AM THE BREAD THAT CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN' - THE BREAD OF
ETERNAL LIFE. THEY REJECTED HIS CLAIM OF BEING THE SUPERNATURAL SOURCE
OF ETERNAL LIFE FROM HEAVEN. THEY SAID, "IS NOT THIS JESUS, THE SON OF
JOSEPH WHOSE FATHER AND MOTHER WE KNOW? HOW DOES HE NOW SAY, 'I HAVE
COME DOWN OUT OF HEAVEN?' " DESPITE THE FACT THAT HIS CLAIM WAS
CORROBORATED BY HIS MIRACLES WHICH WERE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM; THEY
LIMITED THEIR FAITH TO WHAT WOULD BEST SUIT THEIR OWN INTERESTS
B) THE JEWS WERE GRUMBLING IN DISBELIEF
ABOUT JESUS CLAIMING TO BE THE BREAD OF ETERNAL LIFE FROM HEAVEN - THEY
REMARKED THAT THEY KNEW HIS HUMAN FATHER AND MOTHER. THEY LIMITED THEIR
FAITH TO WHAT WOULD BEST SERVE THEIR OWN INTERESTS. JESUS TOLD THE JEWS
NOT TO GRUMBLE AMONG THEMSELVES ABOUT HIM, FOR NO ONE WAS ABLE TO COME
BY FAITH TO HIM IF THE FATHER WHO SENT HIM DID NOT DRAW HIM. HE TOLD
THEM THAT, ON THE LAST DAY, THOSE WHO DID BELIEVE, HE WILL RAISE UP TO
EVERLASTING LIFE. ALTHOUGH BELIEVING IS VOLITIONAL AND ANYONE MAY
CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IN HIM, ONLY THOSE WHO ARE DRAWN BY THE FATHER WILL
CHOOSE TO COME TO JESUS BY FAITH TO RECEIVE ETERNAL LIFE
C) THE ETERNAL SECURITY OF THE BELIEVER
IS BASED SOLELY UPON THE PROMISE AND CAPACITY OF GOD AND HIS SON TO
RAISE ALL BELIEVERS UP AT THE LAST DAY
D SINCE THE
INHERENT NATURE OF BELIEVING BY DEFINITION IS FREE WILL,
THEN THE FATHER'S DRAWING OF AN INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT IMPOSE HIS WILL
UPON THAT INDIVIDUAL, NOR FORCE THAT INDIVIDUAL TO BELIEVE, NOR
OVERRIDE MAN'S CAPACITY TO BELIEVE; RATHER THE FATHER'S DRAWING ENABLES
THE INDIVIDUAL, PERSUADES HIM TO CHOOSE OF HIS OWN VOLITION, TO BELIEVE
IN JESUS CHRIST FOR ETERNAL LIFE
E)
AN INDIVIDUAL'S CHOICE TO BE TAUGHT BY
THE LORD - TO CHOOSE TO LISTEN TO AND TO LEARN FROM THE FATHER - IS A
FUNCTION OF GOD'S DRAWING OF HIM, WHICH DRAWING INEVITABLY RESULTS IN
THE INDIVIDUAL TO BE ABLE TO AND CHOOSE TO COME TO A MOMENT OF FAITH
ALONE IN JESUS CHRIST ALONE TO BECOME AN ETERNAL CHILD OF GOD IN THE
KINGDOM OF GOD
UNTO ETERNAL LIFE, IN THE PATTERN OF THE CHILDREN OF ANCIENT ISRAEL WHO
WILL ENTER THE ETERNAL KINGDOM OF GOD BY THAT SAME FAITH
1) [Isa 54:13]:
F) THE FATHER DRAWS CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS
WHEREUPON THEY CHOOSE TO BE TAUGHT BY HIM, TO LISTEN AND LEARN FROM
HIM; WHEREUPON IT IS EXCLUSIVELY THESE WHO CHOOSE TO COME TO A MOMENT
OF FAITH ALONE IN JESUS CHRIST ALONE UNTO ETERNAL LIFE. THIS IS NOT TO
SAY THAT ANYONE HAS SEEN THE FATHER EXCEPT HE WHO IS FROM GOD - MEANING
HIMSELF. THIS IMPLIES DIETY AND AN ETERNAL FACE TO FACE RELATIONSHIP
WITH THE FATHER AS THE ETERNAL SON OF GOD
G) FOR THE EIGHTH TIME IN CHAPTER SIX,
JESUS INDICATED THAT A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN CHRIST ALONE
IMMEDIATELY RESULTED IN ETERNAL LIFE FOREVER. WHEREUPON, JESUS
REITERATED, 'I AM THE BREAD OF [ETERNAL] LIFE.' HE THEN COMPARED THE
LITERAL / PHYSICAL MANNA-BREAD WHICH ONLY SUSTAINED THE TEMPORAL LIVES
OF THE ANCIENT ISRAELITES WITH REPEATED INGESTION - HENCE THEY ALL DIED
AS ALL MEN DIE - TO THE FIGURATIVE / SPIRITUAL BREAD OF ETERNAL LIFE
THAT CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN - HIMSELF - WHO ONLY NEEDED TO BE RECEIVED
ONE TIME BY A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN HIM ALONE TO RECEIVE ETERNAL
LIFE. NOTE THAT A LITERAL PHYSICAL EATING OF THE FLESH OF JESUS CHRIST
IS NOT IN VIEW
1) [Compare Jn 6:36]:
a) Jesus Indicated That The
Manna Bread Was Given By God Through Moses Which Was Perishable And
Only Sustained The Physical Lives Of The Ancient Israelites; But So
Much The More, Jesus Was The True Bread Of God From Heaven Who Had Come
Down To Give Eternal Life To All Life To All Who Believed - A Far
Greater Miracle Whom They Had Seen But In Whom They Did Not Believe
H) MOST OF THE CROWD REFUSED
TO BELIEVE IN WHAT JESUS SAID DESPITE HIS SCRIPTURAL TESTIMONY,
MIRACLES AND FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECY. WHEN HE SAID "IF ANYONE EATS OF
THIS BREAD, HE WILL LIVE FOREVER AND THE BREAD THAT I SHALL GIVE IS MY
FLESH, WHICH I SHALL GIVE FOR THE LIFE OF THE WORLD," THEY MAINTAINED
THAT JESUS' MESSAGE WAS LITERAL - IMPLYING CANNABALISM. BUT THE RULES
OF LANGUAGE, CONTEXT AND LOGIC DO NOT PERMIT THIS, THEY RESTRICT HIS
MESSAGE TO BEING FIGURATIVE FOR A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN JESUS CHRIST
ALONE TO RECEIVE ETERNAL LIFE
VIII) [Jn 6:52-59]:
A) THE JEWS REFUSED TO ACCEPT JESUS'
TESTIMONY. THEY DEMONSTRATED THEIR UNWILLINGNESS TO BELIEVE IN HIM AS
MANKIND'S EXLUSIVE SOURCE OF ETERNAL LIFE BY DELIBERATELY
MISINTERPRETING HIM. THEY ARGUED THAT HE WAS IMPLYING THAT ONE WOULD
HAVE TO PHYSICALLY EAT HIS FLESH AND DRINK HIS BLOOD. THEIR
SELF-IMPOSED IRRATIONAL BLINDNESS BLOCKED OUT JESUS' IMPLICATION OF A
FUTURE ATONING SACRIFICE FOR THE SINS OF THE WORLD WHICH HE HAD
REPEATEDLY STIPULATED WAS TO BE RECEIVED BY A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN
HIM ALONE UNTO ETERNAL LIFE
B) THE MEANING OF JN 6:53-56 HAS BEEN
ESTABLISHED BY JN 6:35, 40 AND 51
1) [Compare Jn 6:53-56 with Jn 6:35,
40, 51]:
2) [Jn 6:53-56 compared with Jn 6:35,
40, 51]:
C) JESUS SAID THAT WHOEVER ATE HIS FLESH
AND DRANK HIS BLOOD, IN THE FIGURATIVE SENSE OF A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE
IN HIM ALONE, HAD ETERNAL LIFE AND ABIDED IN JESUS AND JESUS IN HIM IN
A MUTUAL, PERSONAL, INTIMATE, ETERNAL FELLOWSHIP - BECOMING ONE WITH
ANOTHER - HENCE JESUS SAID HE WOULD RAISE HIM UP ON THE LAST DAY. SO
JESUS AFFIRMED THAT HIS FLESH TRULY WAS FOOD AND HIS BLOOD TRULY WAS
DRINK, SUCH THAT IF AN INDIVIDUAL DID NOT EAT HIS FLESH OR DRINK HIS
BLOOD IN THE FIGURATIVE SENSE, THEN HE DID NOT HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. JESUS
SPOKE THESE THINGS TEACHING IN A SYNAGOGUE IN CAPERNAUM
D) ALTHOUGH JESUS WAS AWARE OF WHAT THE
JEWS WERE ARGUING ABOUT AMONGST THEMSELVES, HE DID NOT BACK OFF -
CONTRARY TO THOSE WHO MAINTAIN THAT CHRISTIANS SHOULD NOT PRESS SUCH AN
ARGUMENT. JESUS PERSISTED EMPHATICALLY WITH "[TRULY, TRULY], I SAY TO
YOU, IF [YOU DO] NOT EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN, AND [YOU DO] NOT
DRINK HIS BLOOD, [YOU] HAVE NO LIFE IN YOURSELVES; WHOEVER EATS MY
FLESH AND DRINKS MY BLOOD HAS ETERNAL LIFE, AND I WILL RAISE HIM UP AT
THE LAST DAY." SO THE GIVING AND CONSUMING OF HIS BODY AND BLOOD FOR
THE SINS OF THE WORLD IN THE SENSE OF A MOMENT OF FAITH ALONE IN HIM
ALONE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ETERNAL LIFE IN A FUTURE ATONING SACRIFICE
FOR THE SINS OF THE WORLD IS IN VIEW, NOT CANNIBALISM
IX) [Jn 6:60-66]:
A) KNOWING WITHIN HIMSELF (SUPERNATURALLY)
THAT MANY OF HIS DISCIPLES WERE GRUMBLING ABOUT HIM AND WOULD NEVER
CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IN HIM, JESUS PERSISTED EVEN WITH THOSE WHO WERE NOT
CHOSEN - AFFIRMING THE DOCTRINE OF UNLIMITED ATONEMENT. HE ADDRESSED
THEIR BEING ESPECIALLY OFFENDED WHEN HE SPOKE OF HIMSELF AS THE SON OF
MAN COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN - THAT ONE WHO ATE HIS FLESH AND DRANK HIS
BLOOD, (IN THE FIGURATIVE SENSE OF BELIEVING IN HIM), WOULD HAVE
ETERNAL LIFE. HE LAMENTED THEIR WILLFUL REFUSAL TO BELIEVE IN HIM AS
MANKIND'S EXCLUSIVE SOURCE OF ETERNAL LIFE BY SAYING HOW MUCH THE MORE
THEY WOULD REJECT HIM WERE THEY TO SEE HIM, THE SON OF MAN, ASCEND TO
HEAVEN FROM WHENCE HE CAME - EVIDENTLY FORETELLING OF HIS FUTURE
ASCENSION. HE EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IT WAS THE SPIRIT - NOT ANYTHING
OR ANYONE IN THE PHYSICAL REALM - WHO GAVE ETERNAL LIFE. HENCE HE TOLD
THEM THAT HIS WORDS WERE SPIRIT, I.E., FIGURATIVE FOR THE SPIRITUAL
REALM AND IN THAT SENSE HIS WORDS GAVE ETERNAL LIFE TO THOSE WHO
BELIEVED THEM. JESUS FURTHER REVEALED TO THEM THAT HE HAD KNOWN WITHIN
HIMSELF FROM THE BEGINNING, (SUPERNATURALLY) WHO WOULD NOT CHOOSE TO
BELIEVE IN HIM AND WHO IT WAS WHO WOULD BETRAY HIM, (REFERRING TO JUDAS
ISCARIOT). JESUS CONCLUDED THAT NO ONE WAS ABLE TO BELIEVE IN HIM IF IT
WERE NOT GIVEN HIM TO DO SO FROM HIS FATHER. FROM THIS TIME ON ALL OF
HIS DISCIPLES WHO REFUSED TO BELIEVE IN HIM UNTO ETERNAL LIFE - WHICH
LEFT ONLY THE TWELVE WHO BELIEVED IN HIM - FOLLOWED HIM NO MORE
1) [Jn 6:63 YLT]:
*** EXCERPT
FROM JN 6:44 ABOVE ***
SINCE THE INHERENT NATURE
OF BELIEVING IS FREE WILL, GOD'S DRAWING OF AN INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT
FORCE MAN AGAINST HIS WILL TO BELIEVE. SINCE MAN'S CHOOSING TO BELIEVE
IS IN VIEW WHICH BY DEFINITION IS VOLITIONAL, THEN MAN'S CAPACITY TO
COME TO JESUS BY FAITH IS IMPLIED. YET THIS CANNOT OCCUR BECAUSE MAN
CANNOT BELIEVE BECAUSE HIS WILL IS EVIDENTLY IRRATIONALLY SET AGAINST
IT UNLESS THE FATHER DRAWS HIM TO BELIEVE
*** END
OF EXCERPT FROM JN 6:44 ***
X) Jn 6:67-71]:
A) WHEN ALL OF HIS DISCIPLES BUT THE TWELVE
WENT AWAY, JESUS ASKED THE TWELVE IF THEY WISHED TO GO TOO. SIMON PETER
ANSWERED, REFLECTING THAT HE HAD BEEN TAUGHT BY GOD, "LORD TO WHOM
SHALL WE GO? YOU HAVE THE WORDS OF ETERNAL LIFE AND WE HAVE BELIEVED,
AND WE HAVE KNOWN THAT YOU ARE THE CHRIST, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD."
JESUS ANSWERED, "DID I NOT CHOOSE YOU, THE TWELVE, AND ONE OF YOU IS A
DEVIL?" AUTHOR JOHN EXPLAINED THAT JESUS WAS SPEAKING OF JUDAS SON OF
SIMON ISCARIOT WHO WOULD SOON BETRAY JESUs
CONTINUE
TO CHAPTER 7